Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Feb;24(2):332-42. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc2225.
Implementing an injury prevention program to athletes under age 12 years may reduce injury rates. There is limited knowledge regarding whether these young athletes will be able to modify balance and performance measures after completing a traditional program that has been effective with older athletes or whether they require a specialized program for their age. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a pediatric program, which was designed specifically for young athletes, and a traditional program with no program in the ability to change balance and performance measures in youth athletes. We used a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of the programs before and after a 9-week intervention period. Sixty-five youth soccer athletes (males: n = 37 mass = 34.16 +/- 5.36 kg, height = 143.07 +/- 6.27 cm, age = 10 +/- 1 yr; females: n = 28 mass = 33.82 +/- 5.37 kg, height = 141.02 +/- 6.59 cm) volunteered to participate and attended 2 testing sessions in a research laboratory. Teams were cluster-randomized to either a pediatric or traditional injury prevention program or a control group. Change scores for anterior-posterior and medial-lateral time-to-stabilization measures and maximum vertical jump height and power were calculated from pretest and post-test sessions. Contrary with our original hypotheses, the traditional program resulted in positive changes, whereas the pediatric program did not result in any improvements. Anterior-posterior time-to-stabilization decreased after the traditional program (mean change +/- SD = -0.92 +/- 0.49 s) compared with the control group (-0.49 +/- 0.59 s) (p = 0.003). The traditional program also increased vertical jump height (1.70 +/- 2.80 cm) compared with the control group (0.20 +/- 0.20 cm) (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences between control and pediatric programs. Youth athletes can improve balance ability and vertical jump height after completing an injury prevention program. Training specificity appears to affect improvements and should be considered with future program design.
实施针对 12 岁以下运动员的损伤预防计划可能会降低损伤率。关于这些年轻运动员在完成对老年运动员有效的传统计划后是否能够改变平衡和表现测量,或者他们是否需要针对其年龄的专门计划,目前知之甚少。本研究的目的是比较专门为年轻运动员设计的儿科计划和传统计划与无计划对青年运动员平衡和表现测量能力的影响。我们使用聚类随机对照试验在 9 周干预期前后评估计划的效果。65 名青年足球运动员(男性:n = 37,体重= 34.16 +/- 5.36kg,身高= 143.07 +/- 6.27cm,年龄= 10 +/- 1 岁;女性:n = 28,体重= 33.82 +/- 5.37kg,身高= 141.02 +/- 6.59cm)自愿参加,并在研究实验室进行了 2 次测试。团队被聚类随机分配到儿科或传统损伤预防计划或对照组。从预测试和后测试会话中计算前-后和内-外侧稳定时间测量值以及最大垂直跳跃高度和功率的变化分数。与我们最初的假设相反,传统计划产生了积极的变化,而儿科计划则没有任何改善。与对照组(-0.49 +/- 0.59s)相比,传统计划后前-后稳定时间减少(平均变化 +/- SD = -0.92 +/- 0.49s)(p = 0.003)。与对照组(0.20 +/- 0.20cm)相比,传统计划还增加了垂直跳跃高度(1.70 +/- 2.80cm)(p = 0.04)。对照组和儿科组之间没有显着差异。青少年运动员在完成损伤预防计划后可以提高平衡能力和垂直跳跃高度。培训特异性似乎会影响改善,应在未来的计划设计中考虑。