Suppr超能文献

羟乙基淀粉对经皮椎弓根螺钉和椎间融合器行后路腰椎间融合术患者止血和电解质的影响。

Hemostatic and electrolyte effects of hydroxyethyl starches in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion using pedicle screws and cages.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 1;35(7):829-34. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8d9f2.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double blind, clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the hemostatic and electrolyte effects of 2 commonly administered hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

HES are commonly administered colloid solutions to restore and maintain intravascular volume before transfusion is initiated. However, infusion of HES itself can impair coagulation. HES-induced coagulopathy could be a serious problem in PLIF which involves continuous bone bleeding and oozing. Voluven (Fresenius Kabi, Germany), previously regarded as the least coagulopathic due to its low molecular weight (MW) and degree of substitution (DS), is a saline-based HES. Hextend (Biotime, United States) is a new type of HES with physiologic pH and balanced electrolytes, including calcium, which is beneficial to coagulation. Studies comparing the coagulopathy of Hextend and Voluven are rare. Therefore, coagulation, pH/electrolyte changes, and blood loss using Hextend and Voluven in patients undergoing PLIF were compared. METHODS.: Fifty-four patients scheduled for PLIF involving 3 vertebrae or less were randomly assigned to the Voluven or the Hextend group. Of each solution 15 mL/kg was administered during surgery. Blood loss, coagulation, and electrolyte profiles were checked before infusion and 5 minutes, 3 hours, and 24 hours after the end of infusion.

RESULTS

The Hextend group showed slightly better electrolyte balance, however, more coagulation impairment and postoperative transfusion (37% vs. 11%) compared with the Voluven group. The effect of Hextend on coagulation lasted until 24 hours after infusion.

CONCLUSION

If coagulopathy is a concern during PLIF, then, a HES with low MW/DS in a saline-based medium (Voluven) may be a better alternative than a HES with high MW/DS in a balanced salt medium (Hextend).

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性、随机、双盲、临床研究。

目的

比较两种常用羟乙基淀粉(HES)在接受后路腰椎体间融合术(PLIF)的患者中的止血和电解质效果。

背景资料概要

在开始输血前,HES 通常作为胶体溶液用于恢复和维持血管内容量。然而,HES 的输注本身可能会损害凝血功能。HES 诱导的凝血功能障碍可能是 PLIF 中的一个严重问题,因为它涉及持续的骨出血和渗血。Voluven(德国费森尤斯卡比),由于其低分子量(MW)和取代度(DS),之前被认为是最不易引起凝血功能障碍的,是一种基于盐水的 HES。Hextend(美国百特)是一种新型的 HES,具有生理 pH 值和平衡的电解质,包括钙,这有利于凝血。比较 Hextend 和 Voluven 凝血功能障碍的研究很少。因此,比较了 Hextend 和 Voluven 在接受 PLIF 的患者中的凝血、pH/电解质变化和失血量。方法:54 例计划接受 3 个或以下椎体的 PLIF 的患者被随机分配到 Voluven 或 Hextend 组。在手术期间,每组分别给予 15 毫升/公斤的溶液。在输注前、输注结束后 5 分钟、3 小时和 24 小时检查失血量、凝血和电解质谱。

结果

与 Voluven 组相比,Hextend 组的电解质平衡略好,但凝血功能障碍和术后输血(37%比 11%)更多。Hextend 对凝血的影响持续到输注后 24 小时。

结论

如果在 PLIF 期间凝血功能障碍是一个问题,那么,在平衡盐溶液中具有低 MW/DS 的 HES(Voluven)可能是在平衡盐溶液中具有高 MW/DS 的 HES(Hextend)的更好选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验