Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Cabell Huntington Hospital, Huntington, WV, USA.
J Perinatol. 2010 May;30(5):343-51. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.195. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
With neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) evolving from multipatient wards toward family-friendly, single-family room units, the study objective was to compare satisfaction levels of families and health-care staff across these differing NICU facility designs.
This prospective study documented, by means of institutional review board-approved questionnaire survey protocols, the perceptions of parents and staff from two contrasting NICU environments.
Findings showed that demographic subgroups of parents and staff perceived the advantages and disadvantages of the two facility designs differently. Staff perceptions varied with previous experience, acclimation time and employment position, whereas parental perceptions revealed a naiveté bias through surveys of transitional parents with experience in both NICU facilities.
Use of transitional parent surveys showed a subject naiveté bias inherent in perceptions of inexperienced parents. Grouping all survey participants demographically provided more informative interpretations of data, and revealed staff perceptions to vary with position, previous training and hospital experience.
随着新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)从多床位病房向家庭友好型、单家庭病房转变,本研究旨在比较不同 NICU 设施设计下家庭和医护人员的满意度水平。
本前瞻性研究通过机构审查委员会批准的问卷调查方案,记录了来自两种截然不同 NICU 环境的父母和医护人员的看法。
研究结果表明,父母和员工的人口统计学亚组对两种设施设计的优缺点有不同的看法。员工的看法因先前的经验、适应时间和职位而异,而父母的看法则通过对两种 NICU 设施都有经验的过渡父母进行调查,揭示了一种天真的偏见。
使用过渡父母的调查显示,经验不足的父母的看法存在一种潜在的主体偏见。按人口统计学分组所有调查参与者提供了更具信息量的数据分析解释,并揭示了员工的看法因职位、先前培训和医院经验而异。