Uysal Tancan, Yagci Ahmet, Ramoglu Sabri Ilhan
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
World J Orthod. 2009 Winter;10(4):383-8.
To investigate whether there is a difference in dental maturation between patients with a skeletal unilateral crossbite and a control sample (individuals with an Angle Class I and no crossbite) and to compare the dental maturation on the right and left posterior segments in both samples.
The sample consisted of 101 Turkish individuals (53 boys and 48 girls, 8 to 13 years of age, mean age 10.90 ± 1.62 years). These subjects were divided into two groups: unilateral posterior crossbite (23 boys and 28 girls, mean age 10.87 ± 2.01 years) and control (25 boys and 25 girls, mean age 10.93 ± 1.14 years). Each subject's dental age (according to Demirjian's dental maturity score) was determined with an orthopantomogram. A difference of 6 months at a significance level of P<.05 was considered clinically significant, so the power of the statistical test was 85%.
No sexual dimorphism was detected for the chronological or dental age in either group. In both groups, the dental ages determined from Demirjian and Goldstein's tables were more advanced than the chronological ages. Dental age did not differ significantly between sides. Subjects with a posterior crossbite had a tendency for a delayed dental maturation compared to the control individuals. A difference of about 1 month was observed between the right and left sides in the crossbite and control groups.
The difference in dental age between the crossbite and control groups was big enough to be clinically relevant. No significant side differences in either group were detected.
研究骨骼单侧反合患者与对照样本(安氏I类且无反合的个体)之间牙齿成熟度是否存在差异,并比较两个样本左右后段的牙齿成熟度。
样本包括101名土耳其个体(53名男孩和48名女孩,年龄8至13岁,平均年龄10.90±1.62岁)。这些受试者被分为两组:单侧后牙反合组(23名男孩和28名女孩,平均年龄10.87±2.01岁)和对照组(25名男孩和25名女孩,平均年龄10.93±1.14岁)。通过曲面断层片确定每个受试者的牙齿年龄(根据德米尔坚牙齿成熟度评分)。在显著性水平P<0.05时,6个月的差异被认为具有临床意义,因此统计检验效能为85%。
两组的实际年龄或牙齿年龄均未检测到性别差异。在两组中,根据德米尔坚和戈尔茨坦表格确定的牙齿年龄均比实际年龄更超前。两侧的牙齿年龄无显著差异。与对照个体相比,后牙反合受试者有牙齿成熟延迟的趋势。反合组和对照组左右两侧之间观察到约1个月的差异。
反合组与对照组之间的牙齿年龄差异大到具有临床相关性。两组均未检测到显著的左右侧差异。