Pienkowski Martin, Eggermont Jos J
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
J Comput Neurosci. 2010 Apr;28(2):285-303. doi: 10.1007/s10827-009-0209-8. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
The effects of nonlinear interactions between different sound frequencies on the responses of neurons in primary auditory cortex (AI) have only been investigated using two-tone paradigms. Here we stimulated with relatively dense, Poisson-distributed trains of tone pips (with frequency ranges spanning five octaves, 16 frequencies /octave, and mean rates of 20 or 120 pips /s), and examined within-frequency (or auto-frequency) and cross-frequency interactions in three types of AI unit responses by computing second-order "Poisson-Wiener" auto- and cross-kernels. Units were classified on the basis of their spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) as "double-peaked", "single-peaked" or "peak-valley". Second-order interactions were investigated between the two bands of excitatory frequencies on double-peaked STRFs, between an excitatory band and various non-excitatory bands on single-peaked STRFs, and between an excitatory band and an inhibitory sideband on peak-valley STRFs. We found that auto-frequency interactions (i.e., those within a single excitatory band) were always characterized by a strong depression of (first-order) excitation that decayed with the interstimulus lag up to approximately 200 ms. That depression was weaker in cross-frequency compared to auto-frequency interactions for approximately 25% of dual-peaked STRFs, evidence of "combination sensitivity" for the two bands. Non-excitatory and inhibitory frequencies (on single-peaked and peak-valley STRFs, respectively) typically weakly depressed the excitatory response at short interstimulus lags (<50 ms), but weakly facilitated it at longer lags ( approximately 50-200 ms). Both the depression and especially the facilitation were stronger for interactions with inhibitory frequencies rather than just non-excitatory ones. Finally, facilitation in single-peaked and peak-valley units decreased with increasing stimulus density. Our results indicate that the strong combination sensitivity and cross-frequency facilitation suggested by previous two-tone-paradigm studies are much less pronounced when using more temporally-dense stimuli.
不同声音频率之间的非线性相互作用对初级听觉皮层(AI)神经元反应的影响仅在双音范式中进行过研究。在此,我们使用相对密集的、泊松分布的短音串进行刺激(频率范围跨越五个八度,每个八度有16个频率,平均速率为每秒20或120个短音),并通过计算二阶“泊松 - 维纳”自核和交叉核,研究了三种类型的AI单元反应中的频率内(或自频率)和交叉频率相互作用。根据其频谱时间感受野(STRF)将单元分类为“双峰”、“单峰”或“峰谷”型。研究了双峰STRF上两个兴奋频率带之间、单峰STRF上一个兴奋带与各种非兴奋带之间以及峰谷STRF上一个兴奋带与一个抑制边带之间的二阶相互作用。我们发现,自频率相互作用(即单个兴奋带内的相互作用)总是以(一阶)兴奋的强烈抑制为特征,这种抑制随着刺激间隔延迟衰减,直至约200毫秒。对于约25%的双峰STRF,与自频率相互作用相比,交叉频率中的这种抑制较弱,这是两个频带“组合敏感性”的证据。非兴奋频率(分别在单峰和峰谷STRF上)通常在短刺激间隔延迟(<50毫秒)时对兴奋反应有微弱抑制,但在较长延迟(约50 - 200毫秒)时则有微弱促进。与抑制频率的相互作用相比,与非兴奋频率的相互作用,抑制和尤其是促进作用都更强。最后,单峰和峰谷单元中的促进作用随着刺激密度的增加而降低。我们的结果表明,当使用时间上更密集的刺激时,先前双音范式研究中所暗示的强烈组合敏感性和交叉频率促进作用要弱得多。