Fischer Carola, Speier Peter, Schaeffter Tobias, Giese Daniel
Department of Medical Engineering, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Magnetic Resonance, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany.
Magn Reson Med. 2025 Apr;93(4):1690-1699. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30358. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
Flow quantification using phase-contrast (PC) MRI is based on steady-state gradient echo (GRE) sequences and is hampered by spatially varying background phase offsets. The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of steady-state disruptions during PC-MRI GRE sequences on these background phases. Based on these findings, a specific sequence and timing is suggested, and caution is expressed when using typical correction algorithms.
Steady-state responses in stationary tissue were investigated in different prospectively triggered through-plane phase-contrast MRI sequence. Different spoiling methods (gradient spoiling/FISP versus gradient+RF spoiling/FLASH) and interleaving of flow encoding gradients (every TR vs. every ECG cycle) were investigated using simulations, in phantoms and in vivo. Additionally, the effect of relaxation times on the phase offsets was simulated and measured. The impact on image- and phantom-based background phase correction was studied.
Good agreement between simulation and phantom measurements were observed. Different sequences lead to different spatiotemporal and tissue dependent background phases. Average flow rates in the popliteal artery were over- and underestimated for ECG-interleaved and TR-interleaved FISP acquisitions compared to FLASH, respectively.
Background phase measurements are influenced by steady-state effects leading to potentially false background phase quantification. Current background phase correction methods cannot correct for the disturbance.
使用相位对比(PC)MRI进行血流定量基于稳态梯度回波(GRE)序列,并且受到空间变化的背景相位偏移的阻碍。本研究的目的是探讨PC-MRI GRE序列期间稳态破坏对这些背景相位的影响。基于这些发现,提出了一种特定的序列和时序,并在使用典型校正算法时予以注意。
在不同的前瞻性触发层面相位对比MRI序列中研究静止组织中的稳态响应。使用模拟、体模和体内实验研究了不同的扰相方法(梯度扰相/FISP与梯度+射频扰相/FLASH)以及血流编码梯度的交织方式(每个TR周期与每个心电图周期)。此外,还模拟并测量了弛豫时间对相位偏移的影响。研究了对基于图像和体模的背景相位校正的影响。
观察到模拟结果与体模测量结果之间具有良好的一致性。不同的序列导致不同的时空和组织依赖性背景相位。与FLASH相比,对于心电图交织和TR交织的FISP采集,腘动脉的平均流速分别被高估和低估。
背景相位测量受稳态效应影响,可能导致背景相位定量出现错误。当前的背景相位校正方法无法校正这种干扰。