Mycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium; International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010 Feb;14(2):131-40.
With the emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), the need for rapid drug susceptibility testing (DST) is felt globally. National tuberculosis control programmes (NTPs) may find it hard to choose from the bewildering variety of rapid tests. We give an overview of the most important methods, discussing their merits and shortcomings, emphasising techniques that offer an alternative to the commercial systems and genotypic tests. Correlation between phenotypic and genotypic DST remains problematic due to our insufficient knowledge of the mutations underlying drug resistance, besides the past standardisation of phenotypic DST. Rapid growth-based DST tends to be less accurate due to growth retardation of some resistant strains. To arrive at optimal resistance monitoring and management of MDR-TB without overloading the laboratories, the test indications and definition of a suspect need careful consideration, while excellent microscopy remains crucial but challenging. The hitherto little-studied fluorescein diacetate vital staining technique may offer the solution, reconciling earlier detection and appropriate pre-selection for rapid DST. For the choice of methods, appropriateness and sustainability should be considered in conjunction with the prospects for complete population coverage. Excellent coverage will only be feasible through decentralisation of simple, low-requirement methods or alternatively by centralised genotypic DST with, in principle, easy specimen referral. The small differences in DST turnover time are relatively unimportant, provided primary culture isolation is not required. No test is fully accurate, and proper pre-selection may allow the use of less accurate but simple screening methods. Conventional slow DST will still be needed for confirmation and for epidemiological monitoring.
随着耐多药结核病 (MDR-TB) 的出现,全球都迫切需要快速药物敏感性测试 (DST)。国家结核病控制规划 (NTP) 可能难以从令人眼花缭乱的各种快速检测方法中进行选择。我们概述了最重要的方法,讨论了它们的优缺点,强调了提供替代商业系统和基因型测试的技术。由于我们对耐药性相关突变的了解不足,以及过去对表型 DST 的标准化,表型和基因型 DST 之间的相关性仍然存在问题。基于快速生长的 DST 往往不太准确,因为一些耐药菌株的生长迟缓。为了在不使实验室过载的情况下优化 MDR-TB 的耐药监测和管理,需要仔细考虑测试指征和可疑病例的定义,同时保持出色的显微镜检查至关重要但具有挑战性。迄今研究甚少的荧光二乙酸活体染色技术可能提供解决方案,协调早期检测和适当的快速 DST 预筛选。在方法选择方面,应结合完全覆盖人群的前景,考虑适当性和可持续性。只有通过去中心化简单、低要求的方法,或者通过原则上易于标本转诊的集中基因型 DST,才能实现出色的覆盖率。DST 周转时间的微小差异相对不重要,只要不需要进行原发性培养分离。没有一种测试是完全准确的,适当的预筛选可以允许使用不太准确但简单的筛选方法。常规的慢速 DST 仍将需要用于确认和流行病学监测。