• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线门诊预约系统“选择并预约”提高了听力诊所的就诊率:一项对比审计。

The online outpatient booking system 'Choose and Book' improves attendance rates at an audiology clinic: a comparative audit.

作者信息

Parmar Vijal, Large Ann, Madden Colm, Das Vijay

机构信息

University Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery and Audiological Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.

出版信息

Inform Prim Care. 2009;17(3):183-6. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v17i3.733.

DOI:10.14236/jhi.v17i3.733
PMID:20074431
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 'Choose and Book' system provides an online booking service which primary care professionals can book in real time or soon after a patient's consultation. It aims to offer patients choice and improve outpatient clinic attendance rates.

OBJECTIVE

An audit comparing attendance rates of new patients booked into the Audiological Medicine Clinic using the 'Choose and Book' system with that of those whose bookings were made through the traditional booking system.

METHODS

Data accrued between 1 April 2008 and 31 October 2008 were retrospectively analysed for new patient attendance at the department, and the age and sex of the patients, method of appointment booking used and attendance record were collected. Patients were grouped according to booking system used - 'Choose and Book' or the traditional system. The mean ages of the groups were compared by a t test. The standard error of the difference between proportions was used to compare the data from the two groups. A P value of < or = 0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

'Choose and Book' patients had a significantly better rate of attendance than traditional appointment patients, P < 0.01 (95% CI 4.3, 20.5%). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sex, P > 0.1 (95% CI-3.0, 16.2%). The 'Choose and Book' patients, however, were significantly older than the traditional appointment patients, P < 0.001 (95% CI 4.35, 12.95%).

CONCLUSION

This audit suggests that when primary care agents book outpatient clinic appointments online it improves outpatient attendance.

摘要

背景

“选择并预约”系统提供一项在线预约服务,基层医疗专业人员可在患者会诊时或会诊后不久进行实时预约。其目的是为患者提供选择并提高门诊出勤率。

目的

一项审计,比较使用“选择并预约”系统预约到听力学诊所的新患者与通过传统预约系统预约的患者的出勤率。

方法

回顾性分析2008年4月1日至2008年10月31日期间该科室新患者的出勤数据,并收集患者的年龄、性别、预约方式和出勤记录。患者根据所使用的预约系统进行分组——“选择并预约”系统或传统系统。通过t检验比较两组的平均年龄。使用比例差异的标准误差来比较两组的数据。P值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

“选择并预约”系统预约的患者出勤率显著高于传统预约患者,P<0.01(95%CI 4.3,20.5%)。两组在性别方面无显著差异,P>0.1(95%CI -3.0,16.2%)。然而,“选择并预约”系统预约的患者明显比传统预约患者年龄大,P<0.001(95%CI 4.35,12.95%)。

结论

这项审计表明,当基层医疗人员在线预约门诊预约时,可提高门诊出勤率。

相似文献

1
The online outpatient booking system 'Choose and Book' improves attendance rates at an audiology clinic: a comparative audit.在线门诊预约系统“选择并预约”提高了听力诊所的就诊率:一项对比审计。
Inform Prim Care. 2009;17(3):183-6. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v17i3.733.
2
Does Choose & Book fail to deliver the expected choice to patients? A survey of patients' experience of outpatient appointment booking.“选择并预约”系统是否未能为患者提供预期的选择?一项关于患者门诊预约体验的调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Aug 1;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-36.
3
Investigating Patient Use and Experience of Online Appointment Booking in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.调查初级保健中患者在线预约的使用和体验:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 8;26:e51931. doi: 10.2196/51931.
4
An effective electronic surgical referral system.一种有效的电子手术转诊系统。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Oct;88(6):554-6. doi: 10.1308/003588406X130642.
5
Telephone triage does not improve attendance rates in a paediatric audiology outpatient service.电话分诊并不会提高儿科听力学门诊的就诊率。
N Z Med J. 2022 Apr 14;135(1553):72-82.
6
Choosing and booking-and attending? Impact of an electronic booking system on outpatient referrals and non-attendances.选择、预约及就诊情况:电子预约系统对门诊转诊及未就诊情况的影响
Health Econ. 2018 Feb;27(2):357-371. doi: 10.1002/hec.3552. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
7
Can a patient-focussed bookings approach reduce patient non-attendance in postnatal and continence physiotherapy?以患者为中心的预约方式能否减少产后和控尿生理治疗中的患者失约?
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Feb 28;42(1):155-160. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy211.
8
Improving attendance at post-emergency department follow-up via automated text message appointment reminders: a randomized controlled trial.通过自动短信预约提醒提高急诊科后随访的就诊率:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):31-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12503. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
9
Telephone reminders improve adolescent clinic attendance: a randomized controlled trial.电话提醒可提高青少年门诊就诊率:一项随机对照试验。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2002 Feb;38(1):79-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00766.x.
10
Two years and 196 million pounds later: where is Choose and Book?两年过去了,花费了1.96亿英镑:“选择并预约”系统如今状况如何?
Inform Prim Care. 2007;15(2):111-9. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v15i2.649.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholders' experiences, perceptions and satisfaction with an electronic appointment system: a qualitative content analysis.利益相关者对电子预约系统的体验、认知与满意度:一项定性内容分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12289-5.
2
Efficient patient care in the digital age: Online appointment scheduling in an ophthalmology practice.数字时代的高效患者护理:眼科诊所的在线预约安排
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 18;10:20552076241287083. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287083. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Patient Opportunities to Self-Schedule in a Large Multisite, Multispecialty Medical Practice: Program Description and Uptake of 7 Unique Processes for Patients to Successfully Self-Schedule (and Reschedule) Their Medical Appointments.
大型多地点、多专科医疗实践中患者自我预约的机会:项目描述以及患者成功自我预约(和重新预约)医疗预约的7个独特流程的采用情况
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 23;11:23333928241271933. doi: 10.1177/23333928241271933. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
The Positive Effect of an Online Appointment Portal on a Breast Cancer Screening Program.在线预约门户对乳腺癌筛查计划的积极影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):609-619. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769910. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
5
The effect of outpatient web-based online scheduling versus traditional staff scheduling systems on progression to surgery and no-show rates.门诊基于网络的在线预约系统与传统人工预约系统对手术进展及爽约率的影响。
J Res Med Sci. 2023 Apr 6;28:23. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_738_22. eCollection 2023.
6
Characterizing No-shows in the Omani Primary Healthcare Setting.阿曼初级医疗保健环境中未就诊者的特征分析。
Oman Med J. 2023 Jan 31;38(1):e457. doi: 10.5001/omj.2023.33. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Automated patient self-scheduling: case study.自动化患者自助预约:案例研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;29(9):1637-1641. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac087.
8
Barriers and Facilitators to Automated Self-Scheduling: Consensus from a Delphi Panel of Key Stakeholders.自动化自助排班的障碍和促进因素:来自关键利益相关者德尔菲小组的共识。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):1m. eCollection 2022 Winter.
9
Barriers to and Facilitators of Automated Patient Self-scheduling for Health Care Organizations: Scoping Review.医疗机构中患者自助预约的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 11;24(1):e28323. doi: 10.2196/28323.
10
Impact of Web-Based Self-Scheduling on Finalization of Well-Child Appointments in a Primary Care Setting: Retrospective Comparison Study.基于网络的自我排班对基层医疗环境中儿童健康检查预约完成情况的影响:回顾性比较研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 18;9(3):e23450. doi: 10.2196/23450.