• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“选择并预约”系统是否未能为患者提供预期的选择?一项关于患者门诊预约体验的调查。

Does Choose & Book fail to deliver the expected choice to patients? A survey of patients' experience of outpatient appointment booking.

作者信息

Green Judith, McDowall Zoe, Potts Henry W W

机构信息

CHIME, University College London, Whittington Campus, Highgate Hill, London, N19 5LW, UK .

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Aug 1;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-36.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-8-36
PMID:18673533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2529277/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Choose and Book is a central part of the UK Government patient choice agenda that seeks to provide patients with a choice over the time, date and place of their first outpatient appointment. This is done through the use of a computerised booking system. After a 2004 pilot study, Choose and Book was formally launched in January 2006. This is the first study of patient experience of Choose and Book since then.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey of reported experience of choice over the time, data and place of appointment, carried out in a National Health Service hospital in London. 104 patients at their first outpatient appointment completed the questionnaire, consisting of a consecutive series of patients referred through Choose and Book and a sample referred through the conventional booking system.

RESULTS

Among the Choose and Book patients, 66% (31/47; 95% CI 52 to 78%) reported not being given a choice of appointment date, 66% (31/47; 95% CI 52 to 78%) reported not being given a choice of appointment time, 86% (37/43; 95% CI 74 to 94%) reported being given a choice of fewer than four hospitals in total and 32% (15/47; 95% CI 20 to 46%) reported not being given any choice of hospital.

CONCLUSION

In this study, patients did not experience the degree of choice that Choose and Book was designed to deliver.

摘要

背景

“选择与预约”(Choose and Book)是英国政府患者选择计划的核心部分,旨在为患者提供首次门诊预约的时间、日期和地点的选择权。这是通过使用计算机化预约系统来实现的。在2004年的一项试点研究之后,“选择与预约”于2006年1月正式推出。这是自那时以来对“选择与预约”患者体验的首次研究。

方法

在伦敦一家国民保健服务医院对预约时间、日期和地点的选择报告体验进行问卷调查。104名首次门诊预约的患者完成了问卷,其中包括通过“选择与预约”转诊的一系列连续患者以及通过传统预约系统转诊的样本。

结果

在“选择与预约”患者中,66%(31/47;95%置信区间52%至78%)报告未获得预约日期的选择权,66%(31/47;95%置信区间52%至78%)报告未获得预约时间的选择权,86%(37/43;95%置信区间74%至94%)报告总共获得的医院选择少于四家,32%(15/47;95%置信区间20%至46%)报告未获得任何医院选择权。

结论

在本研究中,患者并未体验到“选择与预约”旨在提供的选择程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec3/2529277/c98ec3c1f7ee/1472-6947-8-36-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec3/2529277/c98ec3c1f7ee/1472-6947-8-36-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec3/2529277/c98ec3c1f7ee/1472-6947-8-36-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Choose & Book fail to deliver the expected choice to patients? A survey of patients' experience of outpatient appointment booking.“选择并预约”系统是否未能为患者提供预期的选择?一项关于患者门诊预约体验的调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Aug 1;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-36.
2
NHS Choose and Book appointment system will be replaced.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的选择并预约挂号系统将被取代。
BMJ. 2014 May 13;348:g3313. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3313.
3
Two years and 196 million pounds later: where is Choose and Book?两年过去了,花费了1.96亿英镑:“选择并预约”系统如今状况如何?
Inform Prim Care. 2007;15(2):111-9. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v15i2.649.
4
The online outpatient booking system 'Choose and Book' improves attendance rates at an audiology clinic: a comparative audit.在线门诊预约系统“选择并预约”提高了听力诊所的就诊率:一项对比审计。
Inform Prim Care. 2009;17(3):183-6. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v17i3.733.
5
The outpatient experience: results of a patient feedback survey.门诊体验:患者反馈调查结果
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 1998;11(4-5):156-60. doi: 10.1108/09526869810230858.
6
Towards standard setting for patient-reported outcomes in the NHS homeopathic hospitals.迈向英国国民医疗服务体系顺势疗法医院患者报告结局的标准制定。
Homeopathy. 2008 Jul;97(3):114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2008.06.005.
7
An effective electronic surgical referral system.一种有效的电子手术转诊系统。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Oct;88(6):554-6. doi: 10.1308/003588406X130642.
8
Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients' opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments.一份用于测量门诊患者对医院咨询科室质量看法的问卷的构建。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Aug 4;2:43. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-43.
9
Waiting lists. Patients' virtue.等待名单。患者的美德。
Health Serv J. 2002 Oct 3;112(5825):24-5.
10
'Choose and Book' in ENT: the GP perspective.耳鼻喉科的“选择并预约”:全科医生的视角
J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Mar;120(3):222-5. doi: 10.1017/S0022215106000132. Epub 2006 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholders' experiences, perceptions and satisfaction with an electronic appointment system: a qualitative content analysis.利益相关者对电子预约系统的体验、认知与满意度:一项定性内容分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12289-5.
2
Assimilation of Medical Appointment Scheduling Systems and Their Impact on the Accessibility of Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.医疗预约安排系统的整合及其对初级保健可及性的影响:混合方法研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 16;9(11):e30485. doi: 10.2196/30485.
3
Factors contributing towards patient's choice of a hospital clinic from the patients' and managers' perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Are the assumptions underlying patients choice realistic?: a review of the evidence.患者选择背后的假设现实吗?:证据综述
Br Med Bull. 2007;83:249-58. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldm024. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
2
Two years and 196 million pounds later: where is Choose and Book?两年过去了,花费了1.96亿英镑:“选择并预约”系统如今状况如何?
Inform Prim Care. 2007;15(2):111-9. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v15i2.649.
3
'Choose and Book' in ENT: the GP perspective.耳鼻喉科的“选择并预约”:全科医生的视角
从患者和管理人员的角度看,影响患者选择医院门诊的因素。
Electron Physician. 2016 May 25;8(5):2378-87. doi: 10.19082/2378. eCollection 2016 May.
4
Any qualified provider: a qualitative case study of one community NHS Trust's response.任何合格的提供者:对一家社区国民保健服务信托基金回应的定性案例研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 23;6(2):e009789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009789.
5
E-referral Solutions: Successful Experiences, Key Features and Challenges- a Systematic Review.电子转诊解决方案:成功经验、关键特征与挑战——一项系统综述
Mater Sociomed. 2015 Jun;27(3):195-9. doi: 10.5455/msm.2015.27.195-199. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
6
Adoption, use, and impact of e-booking in private medical practices: mixed-methods evaluation of a two-year showcase project in Canada.电子预约在私人医疗实践中的采用、使用和影响:加拿大为期两年的展示项目的混合方法评估。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 Sep 24;2(2):e24. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3669.
7
Development and implementation of a decision pathway for general practitioners for the management or referral of suspected allergy.为全科医生制定并实施针对疑似过敏管理或转诊的决策路径。
J Public Health Res. 2014 Jul 1;3(2):248. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2014.248. eCollection 2014 Jul 2.
8
Patient choice for older people in english NHS primary care: theory and practice.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)基层医疗中老年人的患者选择:理论与实践
ISRN Family Med. 2014 Mar 4;2014:742676. doi: 10.1155/2014/742676. eCollection 2014.
9
A qualitative evaluation of general practitioners' views on protocol-driven eReferral in Scotland.苏格兰全科医生对基于协议的电子转诊的看法的定性评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Apr 9;14:30. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-30.
10
Follow-up care in cancer: adjusting for referral targets and extending choice.癌症的随访护理:调整转诊目标并扩大选择范围。
Health Expect. 2013 Mar;16(1):56-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00691.x. Epub 2011 May 25.
J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Mar;120(3):222-5. doi: 10.1017/S0022215106000132. Epub 2006 Jan 27.
4
Choice.选择
BMJ. 2005 Dec 24;331(7531):1488-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1488.