• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两年过去了,花费了1.96亿英镑:“选择并预约”系统如今状况如何?

Two years and 196 million pounds later: where is Choose and Book?

作者信息

Rashid Mohammed, Abeysundra Lasitha, Mohd-Isa Ahmad, Khan Yahya, Sismeiro Catarina

机构信息

Undergraduate School of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.

出版信息

Inform Prim Care. 2007;15(2):111-9. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v15i2.649.

DOI:10.14236/jhi.v15i2.649
PMID:17877873
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Introduced in 2004, Choose and Book was one of the National Programme for Information Technology's vanguard initiatives. It was to transform the old booking system by combining, for the first time, electronic booking with patient choice of their first hospital appointment. However, doctors' use of the system has been reported as being persistently low. This study, carried out in London, endeavoured to explore doctor's views about the system and to see how far it has progressed.

METHOD

A questionnaire was devised and administered via an email invitation, to doctors. It was sent to 1800 and completed by 105 hospital consultants and general practitioners.

RESULTS

Most doctors thought that the concept of electronic booking itself was a good idea. The benefits that have been observed so far include an improvement in patient attendance at their appointments and the ability of doctors to track referrals. The biggest problems were described as an increased workload, technical problems and an uneven distribution of appointments between hospitals. In addition, most doctors thought that patient choice was a misguided concept in electronic booking and most reported that they were unsatisfied with Choose and Book overall.

LIMITATIONS

The 6% response rate may make the results less likely to be representative of the whole survey population. The authors acknowledge this and have made recommendations as to how to more comprehensively test the objectives of this study, in future.

CONCLUSION

In general, Choose and Book is still poorly perceived by doctors - particularly with respect to technical problems. There is still some support for the concept of electronic booking; however the patient choice element faces more resistance. Additional research is needed on this topic to further investigate the use of electronic systems in the health service.

摘要

背景与目的

“选择与预约”系统于2004年推出,是国家信息技术计划的先锋举措之一。它旨在通过首次将电子预约与患者对首次医院预约的选择相结合,来改造旧的预约系统。然而,据报道医生对该系统的使用率一直很低。这项在伦敦进行的研究,力图探究医生对该系统的看法,并了解其进展情况。

方法

设计了一份问卷,并通过电子邮件邀请向医生发放。共发送了1800份问卷,105位医院顾问和全科医生完成了问卷。

结果

大多数医生认为电子预约本身的概念是个好主意。目前已观察到的好处包括患者预约就诊率的提高以及医生跟踪转诊的能力。最大的问题被描述为工作量增加、技术问题以及医院之间预约分配不均。此外,大多数医生认为患者选择在电子预约中是一个被误导的概念,并且大多数人表示他们对“选择与预约”系统总体上不满意。

局限性

6%的回复率可能使结果不太可能代表整个调查人群。作者承认这一点,并就未来如何更全面地测试本研究的目标提出了建议。

结论

总体而言,医生对“选择与预约”系统的评价仍然很低——特别是在技术问题方面。对电子预约的概念仍有一些支持;然而,患者选择这一要素面临更多阻力。需要对该主题进行更多研究,以进一步调查电子系统在医疗服务中的使用情况。

相似文献

1
Two years and 196 million pounds later: where is Choose and Book?两年过去了,花费了1.96亿英镑:“选择并预约”系统如今状况如何?
Inform Prim Care. 2007;15(2):111-9. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v15i2.649.
2
An effective electronic surgical referral system.一种有效的电子手术转诊系统。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Oct;88(6):554-6. doi: 10.1308/003588406X130642.
3
Does Choose & Book fail to deliver the expected choice to patients? A survey of patients' experience of outpatient appointment booking.“选择并预约”系统是否未能为患者提供预期的选择?一项关于患者门诊预约体验的调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Aug 1;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-36.
4
Choose and Book: a sociological analysis of 'resistance' to an expert system.选择与预约系统:对专家系统“抵制”的社会学分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Mar;104:210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.014. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
5
Choosing and booking-and attending? Impact of an electronic booking system on outpatient referrals and non-attendances.选择、预约及就诊情况:电子预约系统对门诊转诊及未就诊情况的影响
Health Econ. 2018 Feb;27(2):357-371. doi: 10.1002/hec.3552. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
6
Questionnaire survey about use of an online appointment booking system in one large tertiary public hospital outpatient service center in China.中国某大型三级公立医院门诊服务中心在线预约挂号系统使用情况问卷调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Jun 9;14:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-49.
7
'Choose and Book' in ENT: the GP perspective.耳鼻喉科的“选择并预约”:全科医生的视角
J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Mar;120(3):222-5. doi: 10.1017/S0022215106000132. Epub 2006 Jan 27.
8
The one-stop trial: does electronic referral and booking by the general practitioner (GPs) to outpatient day case surgery reduce waiting time and costs? A randomized controlled trial protocol.一站式试验:全科医生(GPs)进行电子转诊和预约日间门诊手术是否能减少等待时间和成本?一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Surg. 2008 Aug 11;8:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-8-14.
9
The National Programme for IT in England: clinicians' views on the impact of the Choose and Book service.英格兰国家信息技术计划:临床医生对选择和预约服务影响的看法。
Health Informatics J. 2009 Sep;15(3):167-78. doi: 10.1177/1460458209337423.
10
The online outpatient booking system 'Choose and Book' improves attendance rates at an audiology clinic: a comparative audit.在线门诊预约系统“选择并预约”提高了听力诊所的就诊率:一项对比审计。
Inform Prim Care. 2009;17(3):183-6. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v17i3.733.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and provider perspectives on the design and implementation of an electronic consultation system for kidney care delivery in Canada: a focus group study.患者与医疗服务提供者对加拿大肾脏护理电子咨询系统设计与实施的看法:一项焦点小组研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 2;7(3):e014784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014784.
2
E-referral Solutions: Successful Experiences, Key Features and Challenges- a Systematic Review.电子转诊解决方案:成功经验、关键特征与挑战——一项系统综述
Mater Sociomed. 2015 Jun;27(3):195-9. doi: 10.5455/msm.2015.27.195-199. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
3
Giving patients online access to their records: opportunities, challenges, and scope for service transformation.
让患者能够在线访问其病历:服务转型的机遇、挑战与范围
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jun;63(611):286-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X668032.
4
How do we identify and support maltreated children?我们如何识别和帮助受虐儿童?
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Sep;62(602):458-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X654461.
5
Does Choose & Book fail to deliver the expected choice to patients? A survey of patients' experience of outpatient appointment booking.“选择并预约”系统是否未能为患者提供预期的选择?一项关于患者门诊预约体验的调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Aug 1;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-36.