Robert Debré Hospital, Paris, France.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 1;35(3):306-14. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7c7c4.
Retrospective study of prospectively collected data.
Compare Universal Clamps (UCs) and hooks for the thoracic correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
In scoliosis surgery, sagittal correction is as important as frontal correction due to the risk of junctional kyphosis. Compared to all-screw constructs, hybrid constructs with lumbar pedicle screws and thoracic hooks or sublaminar wires have been shown to achieve similar coronal correction while providing superior postoperative thoracic kyphosis. The authors used a novel sublaminar thoracic implant, the UC with improvements over sublaminar wires. Hybrid constructs using thoracic UCs were compared to those with thoracic hooks.
This series involved 150 patients treated for AIS with hybrid constructs. A total of 75 consecutive patients operated from 2001 to 2003, who had thoracic hooks with in situ contouring, distraction, and compression (Group 1), were compared to 75 consecutive patients operated from 2004 to 2006, who had thoracic UCs with posteromedial translation (Group 2). All had intraoperative somatosensory/motor-evoked potential monitoring and at least 2-years follow-up.
Except for follow-up (longer in Group 1), the 2 groups were similar before surgery. The UCs achieved better thoracic coronal correction (P < 0.001), Cincinnati index (P < 0.001), kyphosis (P = 0.02), and apical rotation (P < 0.001). In normokyphotic or hypokyphotic patients, the UC corrected thoracic kyphosis by 11.2 degrees (55%) versus 0.4 degrees (2%) achieved by hooks (P < 0.0001). These differences were stable at last follow-up. There were no intraoperative complications or changes in somatosensory/motor-evoked potentials. UC reduced operative time by 20% (60 minutes; P < 0.001) and blood loss by 23% (250 mL; P < 0.001).
Although both of these hybrid constructs efficaciously corrected the coronal and axial deformities in AIS, the results of the UC technique were superior to those achieved with hooks in all 3 planes, especially the sagittal plane. Moreover, the UC technique is straightforward and safe, reducing both operative duration and blood loss.
前瞻性收集数据的回顾性研究。
比较通用夹(UCs)和钩子在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)的胸椎矫正中的作用。
在脊柱侧凸手术中,矢状面矫正与额状面矫正同样重要,因为存在交界性后凸的风险。与全螺钉结构相比,具有腰椎椎弓根螺钉和胸椎钩或 360 度环绕钢丝的混合结构在获得相似的冠状面矫正的同时,提供了更好的术后胸椎后凸。作者使用了一种新的胸椎后路内固定物,即 UCs,与 360 度环绕钢丝相比,它有了改进。使用胸椎 UCs 的混合结构与使用胸椎钩的混合结构进行了比较。
本系列涉及 150 例采用混合结构治疗 AIS 的患者。共有 75 例连续患者接受手术治疗,这些患者在 2001 年至 2003 年期间接受了胸椎钩治疗,具有原位塑形、牵引和压缩(第 1 组),并与 2004 年至 2006 年期间接受了胸椎 UCs 治疗的 75 例连续患者进行了比较,这些患者具有经后路平移(第 2 组)。所有患者均接受术中体感/运动诱发电位监测和至少 2 年的随访。
除了随访时间(第 1 组更长)外,两组患者在手术前相似。UCs 实现了更好的胸椎冠状面矫正(P < 0.001)、辛辛那提指数(P < 0.001)、后凸(P = 0.02)和顶椎旋转(P < 0.001)。在正常后凸或轻度后凸患者中,UC 矫正的胸椎后凸角度为 11.2 度(55%),而钩子为 0.4 度(2%)(P < 0.0001)。这些差异在最后一次随访时是稳定的。术中没有发生并发症或体感/运动诱发电位变化。UC 减少了 20%的手术时间(60 分钟;P < 0.001)和 23%的出血量(250 毫升;P < 0.001)。
尽管这两种混合结构都有效地矫正了 AIS 的冠状面和轴向畸形,但 UCs 技术在所有三个平面(尤其是矢状面)的结果均优于钩子。此外,UC 技术简单安全,可减少手术时间和出血量。