Suppr超能文献

混合钩-螺钉器械与通用夹系统治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的临床和影像学结果比较

Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcome of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated with Hybrid Hook-Screw Instrumentation versus Universal Clamp System.

作者信息

Ghayem Hassankhani Ebrahim, Omidi-Kashani Farzad, Moradkhani Shahram, Ghayem Hassankhani Golnaz, Shakeri Mohammad Taghi

机构信息

Orthopedic Research Center, Orthopedic Department, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Orthopedic Department, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Adv Med. 2016;2016:7639727. doi: 10.1155/2016/7639727. Epub 2016 Oct 30.

Abstract

In surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), hybrid universal clamp system has been used by some authors. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiologic outcome of hybrid universal clamp with hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw. A prospective study was performed on 56 consecutive patients with AIS, who had alternatively undergone a posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation with hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw system (28 patients: group A) and hybrid universal clamp system (28 patients: group B) between June 2006 and January 2014 at Imam Reza University Hospital and had been followed up for more than two years. The comparison was according to radiographic changes, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) outcome scores. The preoperative mean curve Cobb angle was 58° ± 7° (42°-74°) in group A and 60° ± 9° (46°-75°) in group B. The mean final coronal curve correction was 60.4% and 75.5% in groups A and B, respectively ( = 0.001). Postoperative SRS outcome scores were also comparable. Universal clamp instrumentation had a significantly better curve correction and lower complication rate compared with hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw. Both instrumentation methods had similar operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative SRS outcome scores.

摘要

在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)的外科治疗中,一些作者使用了混合通用夹系统。我们旨在比较混合通用夹与混合胸钩腰椎螺钉的临床和放射学结果。对56例连续的AIS患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,这些患者在2006年6月至2014年1月期间于伊玛目·礼萨大学医院交替接受了后路脊柱融合术及混合胸钩腰椎螺钉系统(28例患者:A组)和混合通用夹系统(28例患者:B组)治疗,并进行了超过两年的随访。比较内容包括影像学变化、手术时间、术中出血量、并发症以及脊柱侧凸研究学会(SRS-22)结果评分。A组术前平均曲线Cobb角为58°±7°(42°-74°),B组为60°±9°(46°-75°)。A组和B组的平均最终冠状曲线矫正率分别为60.4%和75.5%(P = 0.001)。术后SRS结果评分也具有可比性。与混合胸钩腰椎螺钉相比,通用夹器械矫正曲线效果显著更好,并发症发生率更低。两种器械方法的手术时间、术中出血量及术后SRS结果评分相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c86/5107211/23ef5c6e4fb3/AMED2016-7639727.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验