Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Kyonggi-do, 463-707, South Korea.
Can J Anaesth. 2010 Mar;57(3):211-5. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9241-4. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
The 90 degrees rotation technique for inserting the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in anesthetized paralyzed patients was compared with the index finger insertion technique.
One hundred twenty Asian adult patients were randomly allocated to either a standard technique group or a rotation technique group. A PLMA size 4 was used for women and size 5 was used for men. In the standard technique group (n = 60), the PLMA was inserted using the index finger. In the rotation technique group (n = 60), the entire cuff of the PLMA was placed in the patient's mouth in a midline approach without finger insertion, rotated 90 degrees counter clockwise around the patient's tongue, advanced and then rotated back until resistance was felt. The primary outcome was success at first insertion. Secondary outcome measures were insertion time and complications.
The success rate at first insertion was greater for the rotation technique group than for the standard technique group (100% vs 83%, respectively; P = 0.003), and less time was required (11 +/- 3 sec vs 19 +/- 16 sec, respectively; P = 0.03). The incidence of postoperative sore throat was lower for the rotation technique group than for the standard technique group (12% vs 33%, respectively; P = 0.009), and blood staining on the PLMA was less (8% vs 40%, respectively; P < 0.001).
The 90 degrees rotation technique for inserting the PLMA is more successful than the standard index finger insertion technique. It is associated with fewer side effects, such as blood on the PLMA and sore throat, which suggests it causes less pharyngeal trauma.
比较在麻醉瘫痪患者中使用 ProSeal 喉罩气道(PLMA)的 90 度旋转技术与食指插入技术。
120 名亚洲成年患者被随机分配到标准技术组或旋转技术组。女性使用 PLMA 尺寸 4,男性使用尺寸 5。在标准技术组(n = 60)中,使用食指插入 PLMA。在旋转技术组(n = 60)中,将整个 PLMA 袖口放置在患者口腔的中线位置,不插入手指,逆时针旋转 90 度绕过患者的舌头,然后推进并旋转回直到感觉到阻力。主要结果是首次插入成功。次要结果指标是插入时间和并发症。
旋转技术组的首次插入成功率高于标准技术组(分别为 100%和 83%;P = 0.003),所需时间更短(分别为 11 +/- 3 秒和 19 +/- 16 秒;P = 0.03)。旋转技术组术后咽痛的发生率低于标准技术组(分别为 12%和 33%;P = 0.009),PLMA 上的血迹也更少(分别为 8%和 40%;P < 0.001)。
与标准的食指插入技术相比,PLMA 的 90 度旋转插入技术更为成功。它与较少的副作用相关,例如 PLMA 上的血迹和咽痛,这表明它引起的咽部创伤较小。