Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Apr 2;208(2):576-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Jan 16.
Research indicates that habitual short sleepers show more rapid accumulation of slow-wave sleep at the beginning of the night. Enhancement in performance on declarative memory tasks has been associated with early NonREM sleep, consisting of the highest percentage of slow-wave sleep. Twenty-four subjects (eight short sleepers <or=7h, nine average >7 but <9h, seven long >or=9h) were tested. Subjects were presented with unfamiliar face stimuli and asked to memorize them for a subsequent test. Following sleep, the subjects were presented with the 40 "old/studied" items intermixed with 40 new and asked to indicate the previously presented stimuli. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were analyzed to verify the existence of the "Old/New" effect, i.e. amplitude difference [in ERPs] between the old and new stimuli. ANOVA on the scores revealed a significant interaction between the stimuli and group. Post-hoc test on the studied items revealed more accurate responses in the short sleepers compared to the average and long sleepers. Strikingly, the long sleepers failed to show significant retention of the old/studied items, with their recognition of old faces not different from chance. Reaction time (RT) responses were faster for the old vs. the new items. Pearson correlation revealed a significant negative correlation between accuracy and sleep duration in the short sleepers. However, long and average sleepers showed a positive correlation between the two variables. ANOVA performed on the ERPs revealed main effects of stimuli and site, and no interactions involving the group factor. In conclusion, our data show that individual differences in recognition memory performance may be associated with differences in habitual sleep duration.
研究表明,习惯性睡眠不足的人在夜间开始时会更快地积累慢波睡眠。在陈述性记忆任务上的表现提高与早期非快速眼动睡眠有关,包括最高比例的慢波睡眠。24 名受试者(8 名短睡眠者 <或=7h,9 名平均 >7 但 <9h,7 名长睡眠者 >或=9h)接受了测试。受试者被呈现不熟悉的面部刺激,并被要求记住它们以备后续测试。睡眠后,受试者被呈现 40 个“旧/学习”项目,与 40 个新的项目混合在一起,并被要求指出之前呈现的刺激。分析事件相关电位(ERPs)以验证“旧/新”效应的存在,即旧刺激和新刺激之间的[ERPs]振幅差异。对分数的 ANOVA 显示刺激和组之间存在显著的交互作用。对学习项目的事后检验显示,短睡眠者的反应比平均和长睡眠者更准确。引人注目的是,长睡眠者未能表现出对旧/学习项目的显著保留,他们对旧面孔的识别与随机没有区别。与新刺激相比,旧刺激的反应时间(RT)更快。Pearson 相关分析显示,短睡眠者的准确性与睡眠时间呈显著负相关。然而,长睡眠者和平均睡眠者之间的这两个变量呈正相关。对 ERPs 的 ANOVA 显示了刺激和部位的主要效应,以及不涉及组因素的交互作用。总之,我们的数据表明,识别记忆表现的个体差异可能与习惯性睡眠时间的差异有关。