• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耳鸣反应问卷:一种与耳鸣相关的痛苦程度测量工具的心理测量特性

Tinnitus reaction questionnaire: psychometric properties of a measure of distress associated with tinnitus.

作者信息

Wilson P H, Henry J, Bowen M, Haralambous G

机构信息

University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Feb;34(1):197-201.

PMID:2008074
Abstract

The development of the Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire (TRQ), a scale designed to assess the psychological distress associated with tinnitus, is described. Psychometric analyses of the TRQ are examined with a total of 156 subjects in three separate samples. The results indicate very good test-retest reliability (r = .88) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .96). Factor analysis yielded four factors that were interpreted as General Distress, Interference, Severity, and Avoidance. Moderate to high correlations were found between the TRQ and clinician ratings (r = .67) and self-report measures of anxiety and depression (r = .58-.87), but a low correlation was found with neuroticism (r = .27). It is concluded that the TRQ provides a useful index of distress related to tinnitus for subject selection and clinical assessment and has potential as a measure of change in coping ability.

摘要

本文介绍了耳鸣反应问卷(TRQ)的编制情况,该量表旨在评估与耳鸣相关的心理困扰。对TRQ进行了心理测量分析,共有156名受试者被分为三个独立样本进行研究。结果显示,该问卷具有非常好的重测信度(r = 0.88)和内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.96)。因子分析得出四个因子,分别被解释为一般困扰、干扰、严重程度和回避。TRQ与临床医生评级之间存在中度至高度相关性(r = 0.67),与焦虑和抑郁的自我报告测量结果之间也存在中度至高度相关性(r = 0.58 - 0.87),但与神经质的相关性较低(r = 0.27)。研究得出结论,TRQ为耳鸣相关困扰提供了一个有用的指标,可用于受试者选择和临床评估,并且有可能作为应对能力变化的一种测量工具。

相似文献

1
Tinnitus reaction questionnaire: psychometric properties of a measure of distress associated with tinnitus.耳鸣反应问卷:一种与耳鸣相关的痛苦程度测量工具的心理测量特性
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Feb;34(1):197-201.
2
Tinnitus Cognitions Questionnaire: Development and Psychometric Properties of a Measure of Dysfunctional Cognitions Associated with Tinnitus.耳鸣认知问卷:一种与耳鸣相关的功能失调认知测量工具的开发及心理测量特性
Int Tinnitus J. 1998;4(1):23-30.
3
The psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire in a Dutch-speaking population.耳鸣残疾问卷在荷兰语人群中的心理测量特性。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Feb;36(1):9-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02256.x.
4
[Validation of French translation of the "Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire", Wilson et al. 1991].
Encephale. 1997 Nov-Dec;23(6):442-6.
5
Psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) Tinnitus Handicap Inventory.中文(粤语)耳鸣障碍量表的心理测量特性。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Aug;34(4):309-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01946.x.
6
Development of the psychological impact of tinnitus interview: a clinician-administered measure of tinnitus-related distress.
Int Tinnitus J. 2001;7(1):20-6.
7
[Evaluation of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: validation of a measure, the PCLS].[创伤后应激障碍的评估:一种测量工具——创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCLS)的效度验证]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):232-8.
8
Relationship of tinnitus questionnaires to depressive symptoms, quality of well-being, and internal focus.耳鸣问卷与抑郁症状、幸福感质量及内在关注的关系。
Int Tinnitus J. 2003;9(2):97-103.
9
The Psychometric Properties of Two Measures of Tinnitus Complaint and Handicap.
Int Tinnitus J. 1998;4(2):114-121.
10
The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus.耳鸣功能指数:一种用于慢性、侵入性耳鸣的新临床测量方法的开发。
Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):153-76. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuromodulation (desynchronisation) for tinnitus in adults.成人耳鸣的神经调节(去同步化)治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 19. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011760.
2
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for Managing Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, and Misophonia: The 2025 Tonndorf Lecture.用于管理耳鸣、恐声症和恐音症的认知行为疗法(CBT):2025年通多夫讲座
Brain Sci. 2025 May 19;15(5):526. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050526.
3
Advanced age is not a predictor for cochlear implantation outcomes in adults with moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss.
高龄并非中度至重度感音神经性听力损失成人人工耳蜗植入效果的预测因素。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Mar 20;91(3):101571. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101571.
4
The Effects of COVID-19 on Tinnitus Severity and Quality of Life in Individuals With Subjective Tinnitus.新冠病毒病对主观性耳鸣患者耳鸣严重程度及生活质量的影响
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70317. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70317.
5
Sensory representations and pupil-indexed listening effort provide complementary contributions to multi-talker speech intelligibility.感觉表征和瞳孔索引的听觉努力对多说话者语音可懂度有互补作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):30882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81673-8.
6
Is Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy the Answer for Tinnitus: A Prospective Study.经皮电刺激神经疗法是耳鸣的解决之道吗:一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):4050-4055. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04778-6. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
7
Examining the overlap between tinnitus and depression questionnaires-protocol for an ICF based content analysis.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的内容分析法研究耳鸣与抑郁问卷之间的重叠——方案
Front Neurol. 2024 Sep 3;15:1376826. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1376826. eCollection 2024.
8
Efficacy of Internet-Based Therapies for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.基于互联网的耳鸣治疗方法的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 31;14(8):813. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080813.
9
The impact of tinnitus on speech perception in noise: a systematic review and meta-analysis.耳鸣对噪声中言语感知的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Dec;281(12):6211-6228. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08844-1. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
10
The Current State of Evidence Regarding Audiologist-Provided Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for the Management of Tinnitus: A Scoping Review.听力学家提供的认知行为疗法治疗耳鸣的证据现状:一项范围综述
Audiol Res. 2024 Apr 30;14(3):412-431. doi: 10.3390/audiolres14030035.