Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97207, USA.
Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):153-76. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0.
Chronic subjective tinnitus is a prevalent condition that causes significant distress to millions of Americans. Effective tinnitus treatments are urgently needed, but evaluating them is hampered by the lack of standardized measures that are validated for both intake assessment and evaluation of treatment outcomes. This work was designed to develop a new self-report questionnaire, the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), that would have documented validity both for scaling the severity and negative impact of tinnitus for use in intake assessment and for measuring treatment-related changes in tinnitus (responsiveness) and that would provide comprehensive coverage of multiple tinnitus severity domains.
To use preexisting knowledge concerning tinnitus-related problems, an Item Selection Panel (17 expert judges) surveyed the content (175 items) of nine widely used tinnitus questionnaires. From those items, the Panel identified 13 separate domains of tinnitus distress and selected 70 items most likely to be responsive to treatment effects. Eliminating redundant items while retaining good content validity and adding new items to achieve the recommended minimum of 3 to 4 items per domain yielded 43 items, which were then used for constructing TFI Prototype 1.Prototype 1 was tested at five clinics. The 326 participants included consecutive patients receiving tinnitus treatment who provided informed consent-constituting a convenience sample. Construct validity of Prototype 1 as an outcome measure was evaluated by measuring responsiveness of the overall scale and its individual items at 3 and 6 mo follow-up with 65 and 42 participants, respectively. Using a predetermined list of criteria, the 30 best-functioning items were selected for constructing TFI Prototype 2.Prototype 2 was tested at four clinics with 347 participants, including 155 and 86 who provided 3 and 6 mo follow-up data, respectively. Analyses were the same as for Prototype 1. Results were used to select the 25 best-functioning items for the final TFI.
Both prototypes and the final TFI displayed strong measurement properties, with few missing data, high validity for scaling of tinnitus severity, and good reliability. All TFI versions exhibited the same eight factors characterizing tinnitus severity and negative impact. Responsiveness, evaluated by computing effect sizes for responses at follow-up, was satisfactory in all TFI versions.In the final TFI, Cronbach's alpha was 0.97 and test-retest reliability 0.78. Convergent validity (r = 0.86 with Tinnitus Handicap Inventory [THI]; r = 0.75 with Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and discriminant validity (r = 0.56 with Beck Depression Inventory-Primary Care [BDI-PC]) were good. The final TFI was successful at detecting improvement from the initial clinic visit to 3 mo with moderate to large effect sizes and from initial to 6 mo with large effect sizes. Effect sizes for the TFI were generally larger than those obtained for the VAS and THI. After careful evaluation, a 13-point reduction was considered a preliminary criterion for meaningful reduction in TFI outcome scores.
The TFI should be useful in both clinical and research settings because of its responsiveness to treatment-related change, validity for scaling the overall severity of tinnitus, and comprehensive coverage of multiple domains of tinnitus severity.
慢性主观性耳鸣是一种普遍存在的疾病,给数百万美国人带来了严重的困扰。目前迫切需要有效的耳鸣治疗方法,但由于缺乏经过验证的标准化测量方法,用于摄入评估和评估治疗结果,因此评估工作受到了阻碍。这项工作旨在开发一种新的自我报告问卷,即耳鸣功能指数(TFI),该问卷在用于摄入评估时,既能记录耳鸣严重程度和负面影响的严重程度和负面影响,也能测量与治疗相关的耳鸣变化(反应性),并且能够全面涵盖多个耳鸣严重程度领域。
为了利用与耳鸣相关问题的现有知识,一个项目选择小组(17 名专家评审)调查了九种广泛使用的耳鸣问卷的内容(175 项)。小组从这些项目中确定了 13 个单独的耳鸣困扰领域,并选择了 70 项最有可能对治疗效果产生反应的项目。在保留良好的内容有效性的同时消除冗余项目,并添加新的项目以达到每个领域推荐的最低 3 到 4 项,产生了 43 项,然后用于构建 TFI 原型 1。原型 1 在五个诊所进行了测试。326 名参与者包括连续接受耳鸣治疗并提供知情同意的患者,构成了方便样本。通过测量在 3 和 6 个月随访时总体量表及其个别项目的反应性,评估原型 1 作为结果测量的构效关系,分别有 65 名和 42 名参与者。使用预定的标准清单,选择了 30 个最佳功能项目用于构建 TFI 原型 2。原型 2 在四个诊所进行了测试,共有 347 名参与者,其中 155 名和 86 名分别提供了 3 个月和 6 个月的随访数据。分析与原型 1 相同。结果用于选择最终 TFI 的 25 个最佳功能项目。
原型和最终的 TFI 都表现出很强的测量特性,很少有缺失数据,对耳鸣严重程度的测量具有很高的有效性,并且可靠性良好。所有 TFI 版本都表现出相同的八个特征,这些特征描述了耳鸣的严重程度和负面影响。通过计算随访时的反应大小来评估反应性,在所有 TFI 版本中都是令人满意的。在最终的 TFI 中,克朗巴赫的 alpha 为 0.97,重测信度为 0.78。与耳鸣障碍量表(THI)的相关性(r=0.86)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)的相关性(r=0.75)较好,与贝克抑郁量表-初级保健(BDI-PC)的相关性(r=0.56)较好。最终的 TFI 成功地从最初的诊所就诊到 3 个月的时间内检测到改善,效果大小为中度到较大,从最初到 6 个月的时间内检测到改善,效果大小为较大。TFI 的效果大小通常大于 VAS 和 THI 获得的效果大小。经过仔细评估,认为 TFI 结果评分有 13 点的减少是有意义的初步标准。
TFI 应该在临床和研究环境中都很有用,因为它对与治疗相关的变化具有反应性,对耳鸣整体严重程度的测量具有有效性,并且全面涵盖了多个耳鸣严重程度领域。