Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 1300 South Second Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
AIDS. 2009 Nov;23 Suppl 1:S79-88. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000363780.42956.ff.
To conduct a systematic review of the literature and examine the effectiveness, optimal circumstances, and best practices for strengthening linkages between family planning and HIV interventions.
Systematic review of peer-reviewed articles and unpublished program reports ('promising practices') evaluating interventions linking family planning and HIV services.
Articles were included if they reported post-intervention evaluation results from an intervention linking family planning and HIV services between 1990 and 2007. Systematic methods were used for searching, screening, and data extraction. Quality assessment was conducted using a 9-point rigor scale.
Sixteen studies were included in the analysis (10 peer-reviewed studies and six promising practices). Interventions were categorized into six types: family planning services provided to HIV voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) clients, family planning and VCT services provided to maternal and child health clients, family planning services provided to people living with HIV, community health workers provided family planning and HIV services, VCT provided to family planning clinic clients, and VCT and family planning services provided to women receiving postabortion care. Average study design rigor was low (3.25 out of 9). Most studies reported generally positive or mixed results for key outcomes; no negative results were reported.
Interventions linking family planning and HIV services were generally considered feasible and effective, though overall evaluation rigor was low.
对文献进行系统回顾,考察加强计划生育与艾滋病毒干预措施之间联系的有效性、最佳环境和最佳实践。
对评估计划生育与艾滋病毒服务相结合的干预措施的同行评议文章和未发表的项目报告(“有前途的实践”)进行系统回顾。
如果报告了 1990 年至 2007 年间计划生育和艾滋病毒服务相结合的干预措施的干预后评估结果,则纳入文章。系统方法用于搜索、筛选和数据提取。使用 9 分严谨度量表进行质量评估。
纳入了 16 项研究(10 项同行评议研究和 6 项有前途的实践)。干预措施分为六类:向艾滋病毒自愿咨询检测 (VCT) 客户提供计划生育服务、向母婴保健客户提供计划生育和 VCT 服务、向艾滋病毒感染者提供计划生育服务、社区卫生工作者提供计划生育和艾滋病毒服务、向计划生育诊所客户提供 VCT 以及向接受堕胎后护理的妇女提供 VCT 和计划生育服务。平均研究设计严谨度较低(9 分中的 3.25 分)。大多数研究报告了关键结果的总体积极或混合结果;没有报告负面结果。
将计划生育和艾滋病毒服务相结合的干预措施通常被认为是可行和有效的,尽管总体评估严谨度较低。