Boys Town National Research Hospital (Hearing Aid Research Laboratory), Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):345-55. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cda9ce.
Although numerous studies have investigated the effects of single-microphone digital noise-reduction algorithms for adults with hearing loss, similar studies have not been conducted with young hearing-impaired children. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of a commonly used digital noise-reduction scheme (spectral subtraction) in children with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing losses. It was hypothesized that the process of spectral subtraction may alter or degrade speech signals in some way. Such degradation may have little influence on the perception of speech by hearing-impaired adults who are likely to use contextual information under such circumstances. For young children who are still developing various language skills, however, signal degradation may have a more detrimental effect on the perception of speech.
Sixteen children (eight 5- to 7-yr-olds and eight 8- to 10-yr-olds) with mild to moderately severe hearing loss participated in this study. All participants wore binaural behind the ear hearing aids where noise-reduction processing was performed independently in 16 bands with center frequencies spaced 500 Hz apart up to 7500 Hz. Test stimuli were nonsense syllables, words, and sentences in a background of noise. For all stimuli, data were obtained with noise reduction (NR) on and off conditions.
In general, performance improved as a function of speech to noise ratio for all three speech materials. The main effect for stimulus type was significant and post hoc comparisons of stimulus type indicated that speech recognition was higher for sentences than that for both nonsense syllables and words, but no significant differences were observed between nonsense syllables and words. The main effect for NR and the two-way interaction between NR and stimulus type were not significant. Significant age group effects were observed, but the two-way interaction between NR and age group was not significant.
Consistent with previous findings from studies with adults, results suggest that the form of NR used in this study does not have a negative effect on the overall perception of nonsense syllables, words, or sentences across the age range (5 to 10 yrs) and speech to noise ratios (0, +5, and +10 dB) tested.
尽管有许多研究调查了单麦克风数字降噪算法对听力损失成年人的影响,但类似的研究尚未在轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失的年轻听力受损儿童中进行。本研究的目的是检查一种常用数字降噪方案(谱减法)在轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失儿童中的效果。研究假设谱减法可能会以某种方式改变或降低语音信号。对于在这种情况下可能会使用上下文信息的听力受损成年人来说,这种降低可能对语音感知的影响很小。然而,对于仍在发展各种语言技能的年幼儿童来说,信号降低可能会对语音感知产生更不利的影响。
16 名儿童(8 名 5 至 7 岁儿童和 8 名 8 至 10 岁儿童)参加了这项研究。所有参与者都佩戴双耳后耳助听器,在 16 个频段中独立进行降噪处理,中心频率间隔 500Hz 至 7500Hz。测试刺激是噪声背景中的无意义音节、单词和句子。对于所有刺激,数据都是在降噪(NR)开启和关闭条件下获得的。
一般来说,随着三种语音材料信噪比的提高,性能都有所提高。刺激类型的主效应显著,刺激类型的事后比较表明,句子的语音识别率高于无意义音节和单词,但无意义音节和单词之间没有显著差异。NR 的主效应和 NR 与刺激类型的双向交互作用都不显著。观察到年龄组的显著影响,但 NR 和年龄组之间的双向交互作用不显著。
与先前对成年人研究的发现一致,结果表明,本研究中使用的 NR 形式不会对整个年龄段(5 至 10 岁)和测试的信噪比(0、+5 和+10dB)范围内无意义音节、单词或句子的整体感知产生负面影响。