Suppr超能文献

灰阶超声未能确定的局灶性肝脏病变的特征:与对比增强超声、64 排 MDCT 和 MRI 与肝特异性对比剂的比较。

Characterisation of focal liver lesions undetermined at grey-scale US: contrast-enhanced US versus 64-row MDCT and MRI with liver-specific contrast agent.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche e Medicina Legale, Sezione di Diagnostica per Immagini, Policlinico Universitario, Via del Vespro 127, 90127 Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Radiol Med. 2010 Aug;115(5):714-31. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0506-3. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the characterisation of focal liver lesions in comparison with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with liver-specific contrast agent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty-seven focal liver lesions, 91 malignant and 96 benign (mean size 3.2 cm) - proved by biopsy (n=12), histology (n=4), MDCT (n=108), MRI (n=44) MDCT/MRI (n=19) - in 159 patients were studied by CEUS. Two expert radiologists consensually evaluated the contrast-enhancement patterns at CEUS. For each lesion, they assessed: (a) nature (benign, malignant, not assessable), (b) specific diagnosis and (c) need for further radiological evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy of CEUS were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 167/187 (89.3%) lesions were correctly assessed as benign or malignant at CEUS, whereas 14/187 (7.5%) lesions remained undetermined and 6/187 (3.2%) were incorrectly assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy of CEUS were, respectively, 89%, 89.6%, 89%, 89.6% and 89.3%. The need for further radiological evaluation decreased to 46/187 (24.6%) lesions after CEUS (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In selected cases, CEUS can be considered an effective alternative to MDCT and MRI and reduce the need for further radiological workup.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估与多排螺旋 CT(MDCT)和磁共振成像(MRI)联合肝特异性对比剂相比,超声造影(CEUS)在局灶性肝脏病变特征描述中的作用。

材料与方法

对 159 例患者的 187 个局灶性肝脏病变(91 个恶性和 96 个良性病变,平均大小 3.2cm)进行了 CEUS 研究,这些病变通过活检(n=12)、组织学(n=4)、MDCT(n=108)、MRI(n=44)、MDCT/MRI(n=19)证实。两位专家放射科医生对 CEUS 增强模式进行了一致性评估。对于每个病变,他们评估了:(a)性质(良性、恶性、无法评估),(b)具体诊断,(c)是否需要进一步影像学评估。计算了 CEUS 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性。

结果

CEUS 正确评估了 167/187(89.3%)个病变为良性或恶性,而 14/187(7.5%)个病变仍未确定,6/187(3.2%)个病变被错误评估。CEUS 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性分别为 89%、89.6%、89%、89.6%和 89.3%。CEUS 后,进一步影像学检查的需求降至 46/187(24.6%)个病变(p<0.001)。

结论

在选择病例中,CEUS 可以被认为是 MDCT 和 MRI 的有效替代方法,并减少进一步影像学检查的需要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验