Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;35(3):324-31. doi: 10.1002/uog.7561.
To assess the accuracy and reliability of four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound imaging using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) employing three different techniques to measure volumes in vitro.
Customized miniature balloons attached to a pump system were used to mimic fetal cardiac chambers. After the balloon model had been immersed in a bath filled with viscous gel, 4D datasets were acquired and three methods were used for volume analysis: three dimensional (3D) slice method, Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL) and VOCAL combined with inversion mode. Accuracy and measurement error were measured as the difference between the volume measurements and the actual volumes. Intraobserver reliability was assessed by computing coefficients of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation (ICC).
Measurement of 76 different volumes, ranging from 0.30 to 4.95 mL, resulted in a total of 912 measurements. The 3D slice method had a mean error of -3.3%, the inversion method underestimated the volumes with a mean error of -6.1%, and VOCAL had a mean error of -2.9%. The 3D slice method had the best agreement (95% limits of agreement (LOA), -11.2 to 4.7%), followed by VOCAL (95% LOA, -14.1 to 8.3%); the inversion mode demonstrated the worst agreement (95% LOA, -21.4 to 9.2%). All three methods were reliable with CV < 10% and ICC > 0.95.
4D ultrasonography with STIC is a feasible and accurate method for calculating volumes of 0.30 mL upwards. In an in-vitro model the 3D slice method proved accurate, was the least time consuming, had the best reliability and had the smallest LOA. This method may prove useful when applied to in-vivo investigations.
评估使用时空图像相关(STIC)的四维(4D)超声成像在体外测量体积的三种不同技术的准确性和可靠性。
使用附着在泵系统上的定制微型气球来模拟胎儿心脏腔室。在将气球模型浸入充满粘性凝胶的浴槽后,获取 4D 数据集,并使用三种方法进行体积分析:三维(3D)切片法、虚拟器官计算机辅助分析(VOCAL)和结合反转模式的 VOCAL。准确性和测量误差通过测量值与实际值之间的差异来衡量。通过计算变异系数(CV)和组内相关系数(ICC)来评估观察者内的可靠性。
对 76 个体积(范围为 0.30 至 4.95 毫升)进行测量,共进行了 912 次测量。3D 切片法的平均误差为-3.3%,反转法低估了体积,平均误差为-6.1%,VOCAL 法的平均误差为-2.9%。3D 切片法的一致性最好(95%一致性界限(LOA),-11.2 至 4.7%),其次是 VOCAL(95% LOA,-14.1 至 8.3%);反转模式的一致性最差(95% LOA,-21.4 至 9.2%)。所有三种方法的 CV<10%,ICC>0.95,均具有可靠性。
STIC 的 4D 超声成像技术是一种可行且准确的计算 0.30 毫升以上体积的方法。在体外模型中,3D 切片法被证明是准确的、最耗时的、可靠性最高的,且具有最小的 LOA。当应用于体内研究时,该方法可能会很有用。