• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力源与创造力的关系:一项检验竞争理论模型的元分析。

The relationship between stressors and creativity: a meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models.

机构信息

Department of Management, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):201-12. doi: 10.1037/a0017868.

DOI:10.1037/a0017868
PMID:20085417
Abstract

Competing theoretical models and equivocal evidence leave unanswered questions regarding stressors' effect on creativity. The present meta-analysis of 76 experimental studies (including 82 independent samples) aims to clarify this association and identify factors that may explain differences between studies. Our results suggest that the effect of stressors on creative performance depends on how stress-inducing the stressor is and what type of stress is induced. We found a curvilinear relationship between evaluative stress and creativity such that low evaluative contexts increased creative performance over control conditions, whereas highly evaluative contexts decreased creative performance. We found a linearly negative relationship between uncontrollability and creativity such that more uncontrollability decreased creative performance. The results suggest that stressors' effect on creativity is more complex than previously assumed and points to the need for understanding boundary conditions that shed light on inconsistent findings.

摘要

竞争理论模型和模棱两可的证据使得压力源对创造力的影响问题仍未得到解答。本研究对 76 项实验研究(包括 82 个独立样本)进行了荟萃分析,旨在阐明这种关联,并确定可能解释研究之间差异的因素。我们的结果表明,压力源对创造性表现的影响取决于压力源的诱导程度以及诱导的是哪种类型的压力。我们发现评价性压力与创造力之间呈曲线关系,即低评价性环境比对照条件下增加了创造性表现,而高评价性环境则降低了创造性表现。我们发现不可控性与创造力之间呈线性负相关关系,即不可控性增加会降低创造性表现。研究结果表明,压力源对创造力的影响比之前假设的更为复杂,并指出需要了解边界条件,这些条件可以阐明不一致的发现。

相似文献

1
The relationship between stressors and creativity: a meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models.压力源与创造力的关系:一项检验竞争理论模型的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):201-12. doi: 10.1037/a0017868.
2
Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance.影响激进创造力、渐进创造力和常规、非创造性表现的因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):730-43. doi: 10.1037/a0022416.
3
The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: a curvilinear assessment.创意过程投入对员工创意绩效和整体工作绩效的影响:一种曲线评估。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):862-73. doi: 10.1037/a0020173.
4
A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship of state and trait anxiety to performance on figural and verbal creative tasks.一项关于状态和特质焦虑与图形和言语创造性任务表现关系的元分析研究。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Feb;37(2):269-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167210392788.
5
Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: a meta-analysis.挑战性压力源与阻碍性压力源与工作态度、离职意图、离职及退缩行为的差异关系:一项元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(2):438-54. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438.
6
The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance.年龄与工作绩效十个维度之间的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Mar;93(2):392-423. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392.
7
Emotional intelligence: an integrative meta-analysis and cascading model.情绪智力:综合元分析和层递模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):54-78. doi: 10.1037/a0017286.
8
Work environments for employee creativity.员工创造力的工作环境。
Ergonomics. 2011 Jan;54(1):12-20. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2010.542833.
9
Social networks, personal values, and creativity: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects.社交网络、个人价值观与创造力:对曲线和交互作用的验证。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Nov;94(6):1544-52. doi: 10.1037/a0016285.
10
Multicultural experience enhances creativity: the when and how.多元文化体验能提升创造力:时机与方式。
Am Psychol. 2008 Apr;63(3):169-81. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of workplace exclusion on employee work behavior in the Chinese context.中国背景下职场排斥对员工工作行为影响的元分析。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 29;16:1280074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1280074. eCollection 2025.
2
Discretion and contextual influences on creative thinking.对创造性思维的谨慎态度及情境影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1565741. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565741. eCollection 2025.
3
Self-transitioning or other-transitioning? The positive effects of LGBTQ + college students' positive coping and perceived academic support.
自我转变还是他人转变?LGBTQ +大学生积极应对和感知到的学业支持的积极影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07204-9.
4
Achievement Motivation and Performance in Wargames: Creativity as a Mediator.兵棋推演中的成就动机与表现:创造力作为中介变量
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 21;15(4):557. doi: 10.3390/bs15040557.
5
On creativity and meaning: The intricate relationship between creativity and meaning in life and creativity as the means to repay existential debt.论创造力与意义:生活中创造力与意义之间的复杂关系以及创造力作为偿还存在性债务的方式。
Commun Integr Biol. 2025 Mar 30;18(1):2484526. doi: 10.1080/19420889.2025.2484526. eCollection 2025.
6
Does Vagal Nerve Activity Predict Performance in a Naval Commando Selection Test?迷走神经活动能否预测海军突击队选拔测试中的表现?
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s10484-025-09702-4.
7
How Does Conscientiousness Relate to Employee Creativity? An Exploratory Study of Frontline Technical Workers.尽责性与员工创造力有何关系?对一线技术工人的探索性研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;15(2):201. doi: 10.3390/bs15020201.
8
The influence of generative artificial intelligence on creative cognition of design students: a chain mediation model of self-efficacy and anxiety.生成式人工智能对设计专业学生创造性认知的影响:自我效能感与焦虑的链式中介模型
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 27;15:1455015. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1455015. eCollection 2024.
9
System-failing creativity in health care.医疗保健领域中导致系统失灵的创造力。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Jun 24;9(1):e10437. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10437. eCollection 2025 Jan.
10
The effect of nature on creativity through mental imagery.自然通过心理意象对创造力产生的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 9;20(1):e0315141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315141. eCollection 2025.