• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创意过程投入对员工创意绩效和整体工作绩效的影响:一种曲线评估。

The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: a curvilinear assessment.

机构信息

Kogod School of Business, American University.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):862-73. doi: 10.1037/a0020173.

DOI:10.1037/a0020173
PMID:20718512
Abstract

Integrating theories addressing attention and activation with creativity literature, we found an inverted U-shaped relationship between creative process engagement and overall job performance among professionals in complex jobs in an information technology firm. Work experience moderated the curvilinear relationship, with low-experience employees generally exhibiting higher levels of overall job performance at low to moderate levels of creative process engagement and high-experience employees demonstrating higher overall performance at moderate to high levels of creative process engagement. Creative performance partially mediated the relationship between creative process engagement and job performance. These relationships were tested within a moderated mediation framework.

摘要

我们将关注和激活理论与创造力文献相结合,发现信息技术公司中复杂工作的专业人员的创意过程投入与整体工作绩效之间呈倒 U 型关系。工作经验调节了这种曲线关系,低经验员工在创意过程投入的低到中等水平时通常表现出更高的整体工作绩效,而高经验员工在创意过程投入的中等到高水平时则表现出更高的整体工作绩效。创造性绩效部分中介了创意过程投入与工作绩效之间的关系。这些关系是在一个有调节的中介框架内进行测试的。

相似文献

1
The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: a curvilinear assessment.创意过程投入对员工创意绩效和整体工作绩效的影响:一种曲线评估。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):862-73. doi: 10.1037/a0020173.
2
The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity.体验到的创造性时间压力与创造力之间的曲线关系:经验开放性和对创造力支持的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):963-70. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963.
3
Too much of a good thing: curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance.物极必反:人格特质与工作绩效之间的曲线关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jan;96(1):113-33. doi: 10.1037/a0021016.
4
The role of job security in understanding the relationship between employees' perceptions of temporary workers and employees' performance.工作保障在理解员工对临时工的认知与员工绩效之间关系中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(2):389-98. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.389.
5
Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time.创造力自我效能的发展与创造力表现随时间的变化。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Mar;96(2):277-93. doi: 10.1037/a0020952.
6
Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance.影响激进创造力、渐进创造力和常规、非创造性表现的因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):730-43. doi: 10.1037/a0022416.
7
Resources Matter: Combined Influence of Job Demands and Job Control on Creative Process Engagement.资源很重要:工作需求和工作控制对创意过程参与的综合影响。
J Psychol. 2019;153(2):141-160. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2018.1503588. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
8
Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior.调节焦点作为创始结构和仆人式领导对员工行为影响的中介变量。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Nov;93(6):1220-33. doi: 10.1037/a0012695.
9
The relationship between stressors and creativity: a meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models.压力源与创造力的关系:一项检验竞争理论模型的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):201-12. doi: 10.1037/a0017868.
10
Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: the mediation of service climate.将组织资源与工作投入与员工绩效及客户忠诚度相联系:服务氛围的中介作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Nov;90(6):1217-27. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217.

引用本文的文献

1
Diminishing returns of task-oriented interaction in digitally-mediated dynamic teams: evidence from amateur sports organizing.数字媒介动态团队中任务导向型互动的收益递减:来自业余体育组织的证据
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 18;16:1548846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1548846. eCollection 2025.
2
Achievement Motivation and Performance in Wargames: Creativity as a Mediator.兵棋推演中的成就动机与表现:创造力作为中介变量
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 21;15(4):557. doi: 10.3390/bs15040557.
3
Psychosocial safety climate as a predictor of work engagement, creativity, innovation, and work performance: A case study of software engineers.
心理社会安全氛围对工作投入、创造力、创新及工作绩效的预测作用:以软件工程师为例的案例研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 6;14:1082283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1082283. eCollection 2023.
4
The Influence of Family Supportive Supervisor Behavior on Employee Creativity: The Mediating Roles of Psychological Capital and Positive Emotion.家庭支持型主管行为对员工创造力的影响:心理资本与积极情绪的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:824840. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.824840. eCollection 2022.
5
Employees' Green Enterprise Motivation and Green Creative Process Engagement and Their Impact on Green Creative Performance.员工的绿色企业激励与绿色创新过程投入及其对绿色创新绩效的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 14;19(10):5983. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105983.
6
Increasing creative self-efficacy: Developing the confidence of biochemistry undergraduates to innovate.提高创新自我效能感:培养生物化学专业本科生的创新信心。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2022 May;50(3):296-306. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21628. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
7
Predicting Innovative Work Behaviour in an Interactive Mechanism.在交互机制中预测创新工作行为
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jan 28;12(2):29. doi: 10.3390/bs12020029.
8
Influence of Prosocial Motivation on Employee Creativity: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus and the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing.亲社会动机对员工创造力的影响:监管焦点的调节作用与知识共享的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 14;12:704630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704630. eCollection 2021.
9
The Influence of Intrinsic Motivation and Synergistic Extrinsic Motivators on Creativity and Innovation.内在动机与协同外部激励因素对创造力和创新的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 4;10:137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00137. eCollection 2019.
10
The First Nationally Representative Benchmark of the Local Governmental Public Health Workforce: Findings From the 2017 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey.地方政府公共卫生人力的首个全国代表性基准:2017年公共卫生人力兴趣与需求调查结果
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Mar/Apr;25 Suppl 2, Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey 2017(2 Suppl):S26-S37. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000939.