• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生投掷运动员的骨矿物质密度和含量:最大力量的影响。

Bone mineral density and content of collegiate throwers: influence of maximum strength.

作者信息

Whittington J, Schoen E, Labounty L L, Hamdy R, Ramsey M W, Stone M E, Sands W A, Haff G G, Stone M H

机构信息

Sports Performance Enhancement Consortium, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009 Dec;49(4):464-73.

PMID:20087308
Abstract

AIM

Bone changes in size and density in response to different levels of stress. Alterations to bone mineral density (BMD) appear to occur in a site specific manner. Even though BMD has been examined in many populations there is a paucity of data looking at strength-power athletes, such as throwers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the BMD of a group of USA Division I collegiate throwers (e.g. shot put, discus, etc.).

METHODS

Seven throwers (4 males; 3 females) who were 19.0 + or - 0.9 years had their BMD compared to an age matched control group (n = 14; 8 women and 6 men) and normative data. BMD was measured with dual X-ray absorptometry. Potential right/left side and sex difference in BMD were also examined. Maximal isometric strength was assessed using a mid-thigh pull while standing on a forceplate which generated force-time curves. Peak force (PF) and normalized peak force (PFa) were then correlated with BMDs.

RESULTS

Generally, throwers had denser bones with male throwers tending to have a greater total BMD (P < or = 0.05). The dominant arm BMD was slightly greater when compared to non-dominant arm (P < or = 0.05). Furthermore, total body BMD was related to PF (r = 0.68, r(2) = 0.46) and PFa (r = 0.56, r(2) = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Throwers have greater BMDs than non-athletes and most other athletes. However, throwers only showed a small indication of sidedness. It is likely that the BMDs observed in this study stem from the training intervention (e.g. whole body heavy lifting) undertaken by this population.

摘要

目的

研究骨骼大小和密度对不同应力水平的反应。骨矿物质密度(BMD)的改变似乎具有部位特异性。尽管已经在许多人群中对BMD进行了检测,但针对力量型运动员(如投掷运动员)的数据却很少。因此,本研究的目的是检测一组美国大学体育协会一级联盟的投掷运动员(如铅球、铁饼等项目)的BMD。

方法

选取7名年龄在19.0±0.9岁的投掷运动员(4名男性,3名女性),将他们的BMD与年龄匹配的对照组(n = 14;8名女性和6名男性)以及标准数据进行比较。采用双能X线吸收法测量BMD。还检测了BMD在左右侧以及性别上的潜在差异。使用站立在测力平台上进行的大腿中部拉伸测试来评估最大等长力量,该测试可生成力-时间曲线。然后将峰值力(PF)和标准化峰值力(PFa)与BMD进行相关性分析。

结果

总体而言,投掷运动员的骨骼密度更高,男性投掷运动员的总BMD往往更大(P≤0.05)。优势手臂的BMD比非优势手臂略大(P≤0.05)。此外,全身BMD与PF(r = 0.68,r² = 0.46)和PFa(r = 0.56,r² = 0.31)相关。

结论

投掷运动员的BMD高于非运动员和大多数其他运动员。然而,投掷运动员仅表现出轻微的左右侧差异迹象。本研究中观察到的BMD很可能源于该人群所进行的训练干预(如全身重物举重)。

相似文献

1
Bone mineral density and content of collegiate throwers: influence of maximum strength.大学生投掷运动员的骨矿物质密度和含量:最大力量的影响。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009 Dec;49(4):464-73.
2
Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density of Division 1 Collegiate Track and Field Athletes, a Consortium of College Athlete Research (C-CAR) Study.《大学生田径运动员的身体成分和骨密度研究》,这是一项由大学生运动员研究联合会(C-CAR)开展的研究。
J Clin Densitom. 2020 Apr-Jun;23(2):303-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
3
The muscle strength and bone density relationship in young women: dependence on exercise status.年轻女性的肌肉力量与骨密度关系:取决于运动状态。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2004 Mar;44(1):98-103.
4
Relationships among bone mineral density, body composition, and isokinetic strength in young women.年轻女性骨矿物质密度、身体成分与等速肌力之间的关系。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2004 Mar;74(3):229-35. doi: 10.1007/s00223-003-0060-2. Epub 2003 Sep 25.
5
Bone mineral density and degenerative changes of the lumbar spine in former elite athletes.前精英运动员腰椎的骨密度与退行性改变
Int J Sports Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;26(6):457-63. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-820991.
6
Strength and power profiles of the lower and upper extremities in master throwers at different ages.不同年龄组成年投掷运动员上下肢的力量和功率特征
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Feb;21(1):216-22. doi: 10.1519/00124278-200702000-00039.
7
Maximum strength-power-performance relationships in collegiate throwers.大学生投掷运动员的最大力量-功率-表现关系。
J Strength Cond Res. 2003 Nov;17(4):739-45. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0739:msrict>2.0.co;2.
8
Dynamic muscle strength as a predictor of bone mineral density in elderly women.动态肌肉力量作为老年女性骨密度的预测指标
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1995 Jun;35(2):136-42.
9
Greater trunk muscle torque reduces postmenopausal bone loss at the spine independently of age, body size, and vitamin D receptor genotype in Japanese women.在日本女性中,更大的躯干肌肉扭矩可独立于年龄、体型和维生素D受体基因型,减少绝经后脊柱骨质流失。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2002 Oct;71(4):300-7. doi: 10.1007/s00223-001-2109-4. Epub 2002 Aug 6.
10
Relationships between bone mineral density, insulin-like growth factor-1 and sex hormones in young females with different physical activity.不同身体活动水平的年轻女性中骨密度、胰岛素样生长因子-1与性激素之间的关系。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006 Jun;46(2):293-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Body Composition and Maximal Strength of Powerlifters: A Descriptive Quantitative and Longitudinal Study.力量举运动员的身体成分与最大力量:一项描述性定量纵向研究。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Jul 1;16(4):828-845. doi: 10.70252/QBHR3061. eCollection 2023.
2
Pathophysiology of Demineralization, Part I: Attrition, Erosion, Abfraction, and Noncarious Cervical Lesions.脱矿生理学,第 I 部分:磨损、侵蚀、缺损和非龋性颈损。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2022 Feb;20(1):90-105. doi: 10.1007/s11914-022-00722-1. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
3
Biological Determinants of Track and Field Throwing Performance.
田径投掷项目成绩的生物学决定因素
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021 May 7;6(2):40. doi: 10.3390/jfmk6020040.
4
Relationships between Isometric Force-Time Characteristics and Dynamic Performance.等长肌力-时间特性与动态性能之间的关系。
Sports (Basel). 2017 Sep 13;5(3):68. doi: 10.3390/sports5030068.
5
Track and Field Practice and Bone Outcomes among Adolescents: A Pilot Study (ABCD-Growth Study).青少年田径运动训练与骨骼健康结局:一项试点研究(ABCD-成长研究)
J Bone Metab. 2018 Feb;25(1):35-42. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2018.25.1.35. Epub 2018 Feb 28.