Taaffe D R, Pruitt L, Lewis B, Marcus R
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, California.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1995 Jun;35(2):136-42.
Although muscle strength has been shown to predict bone mineral density (BMD) in older adults, the variance explained by isometric and isokinetic testing has been generally low (< 20%) and limited to only a few exercises and muscle groups. To elucidate the relationship of muscle strength to BMD at multiple sites, and to ascertain the most robust predictor of BMD using isotonic strength testing apparatus, we examined dynamic muscle strength and BMD in 40 healthy elderly women aged 65-82 years. BMD of the spine (L2-4), proximal femur (neck, trochanter, Ward's triangle), forearm (midradius), and whole body were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Dynamic strength (1-RM), utilizing isotonic weight-lifting equipment, was assessed for 10 standard upper and lower body exercises. In stepwise multiple regressions, leg press was the only independent predictor of spine (R2 = 0.11), neck and trochanter (R2 = 0.21 and 0.18), forearm (R2 = 0.21), and whole body BMD (R2 = 0.19), while bench press was an independent predictor of Ward's BMD (R2 = 0.12). The most robust predictor of regional and whole body BMD using isotonic equipment was the leg press, which may reflect overall skeletal health in this population. The portion of variance explained by dynamic muscle strength (11-21%) is similar to that reported when strength is assessed by isometric and isokinetic testing. The relationship of dynamic strength to BMD was not generally site-specific.
尽管已有研究表明肌肉力量可预测老年人的骨密度(BMD),但等长和等速测试所解释的方差通常较低(<20%),且仅限于少数运动和肌肉群。为了阐明肌肉力量与多个部位骨密度之间的关系,并使用等张力量测试设备确定骨密度的最可靠预测指标,我们对40名年龄在65 - 82岁的健康老年女性的动态肌肉力量和骨密度进行了检查。采用双能X线吸收法测量脊柱(L2 - 4)、股骨近端(颈部、大转子、沃德三角区)、前臂(桡骨中段)和全身的骨密度。利用等张举重设备评估10项标准的上、下肢运动的动态力量(1次重复最大重量,1-RM)。在逐步多元回归分析中,腿举是脊柱(R2 = 0.11)、颈部和大转子(R2 = 0.21和0.18)、前臂(R2 = 0.21)和全身骨密度(R2 = 0.19)的唯一独立预测指标,而卧推是沃德三角区骨密度的独立预测指标(R2 = 0.12)。使用等张设备时,区域和全身骨密度的最可靠预测指标是腿举,这可能反映了该人群的整体骨骼健康状况。动态肌肉力量所解释的方差比例(11 - 21%)与等长和等速测试评估力量时所报告的比例相似。动态力量与骨密度之间的关系通常并非部位特异性的。