Akolo Christopher, Adetifa Ifedayo, Shepperd Sasha, Volmink Jimmy
Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LF.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD000171. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000171.pub3.
Individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are at an increased risk of developing active tuberculosis (TB). It is known that treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI), also referred to as TB preventive therapy or chemoprophylaxis, helps to prevent progression to active disease in HIV negative populations. However, the extent and magnitude of protection (if any) associated with preventive therapy in those infected with HIV should be quantified. This present study is an update of the original review.
To determine the effectiveness of TB preventive therapy in reducing the risk of active tuberculosis and death in HIV-infected persons.
This review was updated using the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, AIDSLINE, AIDSTRIALS, AIDSearch, NLM Gateway and AIDSDRUGS (publication date from 01 July 2002 to 04 April 2008). We also scanned reference lists of articles and contacted authors and other researchers in the field in an attempt to identify additional studies that may be eligible for inclusion in this review.
We included randomized controlled trials in which HIV positive individuals were randomly allocated to TB preventive therapy or placebo, or to alternative TB preventive therapy regimens. Participants could be tuberculin skin test positive or negative, but without active tuberculosis.
Three reviewers independently applied the study selection criteria, assessed study quality and extracted data. Effects were assessed using relative risk for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data.
12 trials were included with a total of 8578 randomized participants. TB preventive therapy (any anti-TB drug) versus placebo was associated with a lower incidence of active TB (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.85). This benefit was more pronounced in individuals with a positive tuberculin skin test (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.57) than in those who had a negative test (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.24). Efficacy was similar for all regimens (regardless of drug type, frequency or duration of treatment). However, compared to INH monotherapy, short-course multi-drug regimens were much more likely to require discontinuation of treatment due to adverse effects. Although there was reduction in mortality with INH monotherapy versus placebo among individuals with a positive tuberculin skin test (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.00) and with INH plus rifampicin versus placebo regardless of tuberculin skin test status (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.95), overall, there was no evidence that TB preventive therapy versus placebo reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.05).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection reduces the risk of active TB in HIV positive individuals especially in those with a positive tuberculin skin test. The choice of regimen will depend on factors such as availability, cost, adverse effects, adherence and drug resistance. Future studies should assess these aspects. In addition, trials evaluating the long-term effects of anti-tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis, the optimal duration of TB preventive therapy, the influence of level of immunocompromise on effectiveness and combination of anti-tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis with antiretroviral therapy are needed.
感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的个体患活动性结核病(TB)的风险增加。已知对潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)进行治疗,也称为结核病预防性治疗或化学预防,有助于预防HIV阴性人群发展为活动性疾病。然而,对于感染HIV的人群,预防性治疗相关的保护程度(如果有)应予以量化。本研究是对原综述的更新。
确定结核病预防性治疗在降低HIV感染者患活动性结核病和死亡风险方面的有效性。
本综述通过使用Cochrane对照试验注册库(CCTR)、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、艾滋病信息数据库(AIDSLINE)、艾滋病试验数据库(AIDSTRIALS)、艾滋病搜索数据库(AIDSearch)、美国国立医学图书馆网关(NLM Gateway)和艾滋病药物数据库(AIDSDRUGS)进行更新(出版日期从2002年7月1日至2008年4月4日)。我们还查阅了文章的参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的作者和其他研究人员,试图识别可能符合纳入本综述标准的其他研究。
我们纳入了随机对照试验,其中HIV阳性个体被随机分配接受结核病预防性治疗或安慰剂,或接受替代的结核病预防性治疗方案。参与者结核菌素皮肤试验结果可为阳性或阴性,但无活动性结核病。
三位评审员独立应用研究选择标准,评估研究质量并提取数据。使用二分数据的相对风险和连续数据的均值差异评估效果。
纳入12项试验,共有8578名随机参与者。结核病预防性治疗(任何抗结核药物)与安慰剂相比,活动性结核的发病率较低(相对风险0.68,95%置信区间0.54至0.85)。这种益处在结核菌素皮肤试验阳性的个体中更为明显(相对风险0.38,95%置信区间0.25至0.57),而在试验结果为阴性的个体中则不然(相对风险0.89,95%置信区间0.64至1.24)。所有方案的疗效相似(无论药物类型、治疗频率或持续时间)。然而,与异烟肼单药治疗相比,短程多药方案因不良反应而停药的可能性要大得多。尽管在结核菌素皮肤试验阳性的个体中,异烟肼单药治疗与安慰剂相比死亡率有所降低(相对风险0.74,95%置信区间0.55至1.00),且无论结核菌素皮肤试验结果如何,异烟肼加利福平与安慰剂相比死亡率也有所降低(相对风险0.69,95%置信区间0.50至0.95),但总体而言,没有证据表明结核病预防性治疗与安慰剂相比能降低全因死亡率(相对风险0.94,95%置信区间0.85至1.05)。
潜伏性结核感染的治疗可降低HIV阳性个体尤其是结核菌素皮肤试验阳性个体患活动性结核的风险。治疗方案的选择将取决于可用性、成本、不良反应、依从性和耐药性等因素。未来的研究应评估这些方面。此外,需要进行试验来评估抗结核化学预防的长期效果、结核病预防性治疗的最佳持续时间、免疫抑制水平对疗效的影响以及抗结核化学预防与抗逆转录病毒治疗的联合应用。