Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF UK), 67-74 Saffron Hill, London EC 1N 8QX, UK.
Malar J. 2010 Jan 21;9:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-28.
Most malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) use HRP2 detection, including Paracheck-Pf(R), but their utility is limited by persistent false positivity after treatment. PLDH-based tests become negative more quickly, but sensitivity has been reported below the recommended standard of 90%. A new pLDH test, CareStart three-line P.f/PAN-pLDH, claims better sensitivity with continued rapid conversion to negative. The study aims were to 1) compare sensitivity and specificity of CareStart to Paracheck-Pf(R) to diagnose falciparum malaria in children under five years of age, 2) assess how quickly false-positive CareStart tests become negative and 3) evaluate ease of use and inter-reader agreement of both tests.
Participants were included if they were aged between two and 59 months, presenting to a Médecins Sans Frontières community health centre in eastern Sierra Leone with suspected malaria defined as fever (axillary temperature > 37.5 degrees C) and/or history of fever in the previous 72 hours and no signs of severe disease. The same capillary blood was used for the RDTs and the blood slide, the latter used as the gold standard reference. All positive participants were treated with supervised artesunate and amodiaquine treatment for three days. Participants with a persistent false-positive CareStart, but a negative blood slide on Day 2, were followed with repeated CareStart and blood slide tests every seven days until CareStart became negative or a maximum of 28 days.
Sensitivity of CareStart was 99.4% (CI 96.8-100.0, 168/169) and of Paracheck-Pf(R), 98.8% (95% CI 95.8-99.8, 167/169). Specificity of CareStart was 96.0% (CI 91.9-98.4, 167/174) and of Paracheck-Pf(R), 74.7% (CI 67.6-81.0, 130/174) (p < 0.001). Neither test showed any change in sensitivity with decreasing parasitaemia. Of the 155 eligible follow-up CareStart participants, 63.9% (99/155) had a false-positive test on day 2, 21.3% (33/155) on day 7, 5.8% (9/155) on day 14, 1.9% (3/155) on day 21 and 0.6% (1/155) on day 28. The median time for test negativity was seven days. CareStart was as easy to use and interpret as Paracheck-Pf(R) with excellent inter-reader agreement.
Both RDTs were highly sensitive, met WHO standards for the detection of falciparum malaria monoinfections where parasitaemia was >100 parasites/mul and were easy to use. CareStart persistent false positivity decreased quickly after successful anti-malarial treatment, making it a good choice for a RDT for a hyperendemic falciparum malaria area.
大多数疟疾快速诊断检测(RDT)使用 HRP2 检测,包括 Paracheck-Pf(R),但其有效性受到治疗后持续假阳性的限制。PLDH 检测的阴性转化更快,但灵敏度低于推荐的 90%标准。一种新的 pLDH 检测,CareStart 三线 Pf/PAN-pLDH,声称具有更好的灵敏度,且持续快速转为阴性。本研究旨在:1)比较 CareStart 与 Paracheck-Pf(R)诊断五岁以下儿童恶性疟的敏感性和特异性,2)评估假阳性 CareStart 检测多久转为阴性,3)评估两种检测的易用性和读者间一致性。
参与者为年龄在 2 至 59 个月之间,在塞拉利昂东部无国界医生社区卫生中心就诊,疑似疟疾的定义为发热(腋温>37.5°C)和/或过去 72 小时内有发热史,且无严重疾病迹象。同一末梢血用于 RDT 和血片检测,后者作为金标准参考。所有阳性参与者均接受监督青蒿琥酯和阿莫地喹治疗三天。对于在第 2 天仍持续出现假阳性的 CareStart 检测的参与者,如果血片为阴性,则进行随访,每 7 天重复进行 CareStart 和血片检测,直到 CareStart 转为阴性或最多 28 天。
CareStart 的敏感性为 99.4%(96.8-100.0,168/169),Paracheck-Pf(R)为 98.8%(95%CI 95.8-99.8,167/169)。CareStart 的特异性为 96.0%(91.9-98.4,167/174),Paracheck-Pf(R)为 74.7%(91.9-98.4,130/174)(p<0.001)。两种检测方法的敏感性均未随寄生虫密度降低而变化。在 155 名符合条件的 CareStart 随访参与者中,63.9%(99/155)在第 2 天出现假阳性检测,21.3%(33/155)在第 7 天,5.8%(9/155)在第 14 天,1.9%(3/155)在第 21 天,0.6%(1/155)在第 28 天。检测阴性的中位时间为 7 天。CareStart 与 Paracheck-Pf(R)一样易于使用和解释,读者间一致性极好。
两种 RDT 均高度敏感,符合世界卫生组织对恶性疟原虫单感染的检测标准,即寄生虫密度>100 个/μl,且易于使用。成功抗疟治疗后,CareStart 持续的假阳性迅速减少,因此是恶性疟高度流行地区 RDT 的理想选择。