Suppr超能文献

三种多物种快速诊断检测试剂在埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚州诊断间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫疟疾的性能比较。

Performance of three multi-species rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria in Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia.

机构信息

Malaria Consortium - Ethiopia Office, Ethio-China Road, PO Box 100224, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Malar J. 2010 Oct 27;9:297. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-297.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malaria transmission in Ethiopia is unstable and variable, caused by both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. The Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH) is scaling up parasitological diagnosis of malaria at all levels of the health system; at peripheral health facilities this will be through use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). The present study compared three RDT products to provide the FMoH with evidence to guide appropriate product selection.

METHODS

Performance of three multi-species (pf-HRP2/pan-pLDH and pf-HRP2/aldolase) RDTs (CareStart, ParaScreen and ICT Combo) was compared with 'gold standard' microscopy at three health centres in Jimma zone, Oromia Regional State. Ease of RDT use by health extension workers was assessed at community health posts. RDT heat stability was tested in a controlled laboratory setting according to WHO procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 2,383 patients with suspected malaria were enrolled between May and July 2009, 23.2% of whom were found to be infected with Plasmodium parasites by microscopy. All three RDTs were equally sensitive in detecting P. falciparum or mixed infection: 85.6% (95% confidence interval 81.2-89.4). RDT specificity was similar for detection of P. falciparum or mixed infection at around 92%. For detecting P. vivax infection, all three RDTs had similar sensitivity in the range of 82.5 to 85.0%. CareStart had higher specificity in detecting P. vivax (97.2%) than both ParaScreen and ICT Combo (p < 0.001 and p = 0.05, respectively). Health extension workers preferred CareStart and ParaScreen to ICT Combo due to the clear labelling of bands on the cassette, while the 'lab in a pack' style of CareStart was the preferred design. ParaScreen and CareStart passed all heat stability testing, while ICT Combo did not perform as well.

CONCLUSIONS

CareStart appeared to be the most appropriate option for use at health posts in Ethiopia, considering the combination of quantitative performance, ease of use and heat stability. When new products become available, the choice of multi-species RDT for Ethiopia should be regularly re-evaluated, as it would be desirable to identify a test with higher sensitivity than the ones evaluated here.

摘要

背景

在埃塞俄比亚,疟疾传播不稳定且多变,由恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫引起。联邦卫生部正在扩大卫生系统各级别的寄生虫病诊断,在基层卫生机构将通过使用快速诊断检测(RDT)进行。本研究比较了三种 RDT 产品,为联邦卫生部提供指导适当产品选择的证据。

方法

在奥罗米亚州的吉马地区的三个卫生中心,将三种多物种(pf-HRP2/ pan-pLDH 和 pf-HRP2/aldolase)RDT(CareStart、ParaScreen 和 ICT Combo)与“金标准”显微镜进行比较。在社区卫生站评估卫生推广工作者使用 RDT 的便利性。根据世卫组织程序在受控实验室环境中测试 RDT 的热稳定性。

结果

2009 年 5 月至 7 月期间共招募了 2383 名疑似疟疾患者,其中 23.2%的患者经显微镜检查发现感染了疟原虫。三种 RDT 在检测恶性疟原虫或混合感染方面的敏感性相同:85.6%(95%置信区间 81.2-89.4)。三种 RDT 在检测恶性疟原虫或混合感染时的特异性相似,均在 92%左右。在检测间日疟原虫感染方面,三种 RDT 的敏感性相似,在 82.5%至 85.0%之间。CareStart 在检测间日疟原虫方面具有更高的特异性(97.2%),优于 ParaScreen 和 ICT Combo(分别为 p<0.001 和 p=0.05)。卫生推广工作者更喜欢 CareStart 和 ParaScreen 而不是 ICT Combo,因为试剂盒上的条带标记清晰,而 CareStart 的“包装内实验室”设计是首选。ParaScreen 和 CareStart 通过了所有的热稳定性测试,而 ICT Combo 的性能则有所下降。

结论

考虑到定量性能、易用性和热稳定性的结合,CareStart 似乎是埃塞俄比亚卫生站最适合的选择。当出现新产品时,应定期重新评估埃塞俄比亚多物种 RDT 的选择,因为最好能找到一种比这里评估的检测方法更敏感的检测方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8b/2988036/2f0c242f82ae/1475-2875-9-297-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验