Faculty of Education and Hughes Hall, University of Cambridge, UK.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Mar;80(Pt 1):1-14. doi: 10.1348/000709909X479853.
This article describes methods for analysing classroom talk, comparing their strengths and weaknesses. Both quantitative and qualitative methods are described and assessed for their strengths and weaknesses, with a discussion of the mixed use of such methods. It is acknowledged that particular methods are often embedded in particular methodologies, which are based on specific theories of social action, research paradigms, and disciplines; and so a comparison is made of two contemporary methodologies, linguistic ethnography, and sociocultural research. The article concludes with some comments on the current state of development of this field of research and on ways that it might usefully progress.
本文介绍了分析课堂话语的方法,比较了它们的优缺点。本文描述并评估了定量和定性方法的优缺点,并讨论了混合使用这些方法的问题。本文承认,特定的方法通常嵌入在特定的方法论中,这些方法论基于社会行动、研究范式和学科的特定理论;因此,本文比较了两种当代方法论,即语言民族志和社会文化研究。本文最后对这一研究领域的发展现状以及如何有益地推进这一领域的发展进行了评论。