• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利宪法法院修改了意大利辅助生殖技术方面的立法。

The Italian Constitutional Court modifies Italian legislation on assisted reproduction technology.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Mar;20(3):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.025. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.025
PMID:20093085
Abstract

On 8 May 2009, the Italian Constitutional Court declared, at least in part, that the law regulating assisted reproduction technology in Italy (Law 40/04) is unconstitutional. The most important theoretical point made by the Court is that the law does not provide unlimited protection to embryos, since it admits that some of them may not produce a viable fetus. Embryo protection is therefore limited by the imperative to ensure a concrete possibility to achieve a successful pregnancy. The Court also reaffirmed the need to empower the attending physician with the means to carry out a full evaluation. At present, the situation is not clear and, theoretically, requires a new intervention by Parliament. This, however, is unlikely.

摘要

2009 年 5 月 8 日,意大利宪法法院宣布,意大利监管辅助生殖技术的法律(第 40/04 号法案)至少在一定程度上违宪。该法院提出的最重要的理论观点是,该法律并未对胚胎提供无限保护,因为它承认其中一些胚胎可能无法产生可存活的胎儿。因此,胚胎保护受到确保成功怀孕的具体可能性这一强制性要求的限制。法院还重申,需要授权主治医生拥有进行全面评估的手段。目前,情况尚不清楚,从理论上讲,需要议会再次进行干预。然而,这种情况不太可能发生。

相似文献

1
The Italian Constitutional Court modifies Italian legislation on assisted reproduction technology.意大利宪法法院修改了意大利辅助生殖技术方面的立法。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Mar;20(3):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.025. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
2
Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction.意大利颁布关于医学辅助生殖的新法律。
Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1153-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh871. Epub 2005 Mar 24.
3
Results and unsolved problems following the amendment to the Italian Law on assisted reproduction brought about by the Constitutional Court.意大利宪法法院对辅助生殖法进行修正后的结果和未解决的问题。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Jul;163(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
4
The new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (Law 40/2004).意大利关于辅助生殖技术的新法律(第40/2004号法律)。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Sep;31(9):536-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010231.
5
Italian Constitutional Court modifications of a restrictive assisted reproduction technology law significantly improve pregnancy rate.意大利宪法法院对限制辅助生殖技术法的修改显著提高了妊娠率。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Feb;26(2):376-81. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq342. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
6
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a step by step guide to recent Italian ethical and legislative troubles.植入前基因诊断:意大利近期伦理与立法问题的逐步指南。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Oct;34(10):e21. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024554.
7
Impact of Italian legislation regulating assisted reproduction techniques on ICSI outcomes in severe male factor infertility: a multicentric survey.意大利辅助生殖技术相关立法对严重男性因素不育症患者卵胞浆内单精子注射结局的影响:一项多中心调查
Hum Reprod. 2007 Sep;22(9):2481-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem180. Epub 2007 Jun 23.
8
The effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology: lessons from the 2004 Italian law.立法对辅助生殖技术结果的影响:来自2004年意大利法律的经验教训。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Apr;89(4):854-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.051. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
9
Access to medical-assisted reproduction and pgd in Italian law: a deadly blow to an illiberal statute? commentary to the European Court on Human Rights's decision Costa and Pavan v Italy (ECtHR, 28 August 2012, App. 54270/2010).意大利法律中的医学辅助生殖及植入前基因诊断:对一项不自由法规的致命打击?对欧洲人权法院“科斯塔和帕万诉意大利案”(欧洲人权法院,2012年8月28日,申请号54270/2010)判决的评论
Med Law Rev. 2013 Summer;21(3):474-86. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwt010. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
10
The issue of constitutional law legitimacy on "human assisted reproduction" between reasonableness of the choices and effectiveness of the protection of all involved subjects.
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2006 Jul-Dec(25):117-37.

引用本文的文献

1
Oocyte Cryopreservation in Oncological Patients: Eighteen Years Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center.肿瘤患者的卵母细胞冷冻保存:三级医疗转诊中心的18年经验
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Sep 3;10:600. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00600. eCollection 2019.
2
Contribution of cryopreservation to the cumulative live birth rate: a large multicentric cycle-based data analysis from the Italian National Registry.冷冻保存对累积活产率的贡献:来自意大利国家注册中心的一项大型基于周期的多中心数据分析。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Nov;36(11):2287-2295. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01566-y. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
3
Italian law on medically assisted reproduction: do women's autonomy and health matter?
意大利辅助生殖医学法:女性的自主权与健康重要吗?
BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jul 23;16:44. doi: 10.1186/s12905-016-0324-4.