Suppr超能文献

一种评估斑块严重程度的无创影像学方法:颈动脉粥样硬化评分。

A noninvasive imaging approach to assess plaque severity: the carotid atherosclerosis score.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Vascular Imaging Lab, University of Washington, 815 Mercer Street, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Jun;31(6):1068-75. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2007. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The presence of IPH and/or FCR in the carotid atherosclerotic plaque indicates a high-risk lesion. The aim of this multicenter cross-sectional study was to establish the characteristics of lesions that may precede IPH and/or FCR. We further sought to construct a CAS that stratifies carotid disease severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred forty-four individuals from 4 imaging centers with 16%-99% carotid stenosis by duplex sonography underwent carotid MR imaging. In approximately 60% of the study sample (training group), multivariate analysis was used to determine factors associated with IPH and FCR. Statistically significant parameters identified during multivariate analysis were used to construct CAS. CAS was then applied to the remaining arteries (40%, test group), and the accuracy of classification for determining the presence versus absence of IPH or, separately, FCR was determined by ROC analysis and calculation of the AUC.

RESULTS

The maximum proportion of the arterial wall occupied by the LRNC was the strongest predictor of IPH (P < .001) and FCR (P < .001) during multivariate analysis of the training group. The subsequently derived CAS applied to the test group was an accurate classifier of IPH (AUC = 0.91) and FCR (AUC = 0.93). Compared with MRA stenosis, CAS was a stronger classifier of both IPH and FCR.

CONCLUSIONS

LRNC quantification may be an effective complementary strategy to stenosis for classifying carotid atherosclerotic disease severity. CAS forms the foundation for a simple imaging-based risk-stratification system in the carotid artery to classify severity of atherosclerotic disease.

摘要

背景与目的

颈动脉硬化斑块中存在 IPH 和/或 FCR 表明存在高危病变。本多中心横断面研究旨在确定可能先于 IPH 和/或 FCR 出现的病变特征。我们进一步寻求构建一种 CAS,以分层颈动脉疾病严重程度。

材料与方法

来自 4 个影像学中心的 344 名患者通过双功能超声检查发现存在 16%-99%的颈动脉狭窄,他们接受了颈动脉磁共振成像检查。在大约 60%的研究样本(训练组)中,采用多元分析来确定与 IPH 和 FCR 相关的因素。在多元分析中确定的统计学上显著的参数被用于构建 CAS。然后将 CAS 应用于其余动脉(40%,测试组),并通过 ROC 分析和 AUC 计算来确定分类的准确性,以确定 IPH 或 FCR 的存在与否。

结果

在训练组的多元分析中,LRNC 占据动脉壁的最大比例是预测 IPH(P<0.001)和 FCR(P<0.001)的最强因素。随后衍生的 CAS 应用于测试组,是 IPH(AUC=0.91)和 FCR(AUC=0.93)的准确分类器。与 MRA 狭窄相比,CAS 是 IPH 和 FCR 的更强分类器。

结论

LRNC 定量可能是一种有效的补充策略,可用于对颈动脉粥样硬化疾病严重程度进行分类,而不仅仅是基于狭窄程度。CAS 为基于成像的简单风险分层系统奠定了基础,用于对颈动脉粥样硬化疾病的严重程度进行分类。

相似文献

1
A noninvasive imaging approach to assess plaque severity: the carotid atherosclerosis score.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Jun;31(6):1068-75. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2007. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
2
Bilateral symmetry of human carotid artery atherosclerosis: a multi-contrast weighted MR study.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Aug;32(8):1219-26. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0890-4. Epub 2016 May 2.
3
Geometric and compositional appearance of atheroma in an angiographically normal carotid artery in patients with atherosclerosis.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Feb;31(2):311-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1793. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
4
Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):27-42. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS142452. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
5
Association Between Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Calcification and Intraplaque Hemorrhage: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017 Jun;37(6):1228-1233. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308360. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
Intraplaque hemorrhage volume in patients with carotid atherosclerosis: How informative is it?
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Dec;33(12):108088. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108088. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
10
Investigating the Association of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque MRI Features and Silent Stroke After Carotid Endarterectomy.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Jul;60(1):138-149. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29115. Epub 2023 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

3
Intracranial plaque with large lipid core is associated with embolic stroke of undetermined source.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2023 Mar;10(3):363-372. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51726. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
Effect of Mid-Basilar Artery Angle and Plaque Characteristics on Pontine Infarction in Patients with Basilar Artery Plaque.
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Feb 1;30(2):182-191. doi: 10.5551/jat.63520. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
6
Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Chronic Carotid Artery Occlusion on High-Resolution MR Vessel Wall Imaging.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Jan;43(1):110-116. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7365. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
10
Signal of Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage on MR T1-Weighted Imaging: Association with Acute Cerebral Infarct.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 May;41(5):836-843. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6498. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Geometric and compositional appearance of atheroma in an angiographically normal carotid artery in patients with atherosclerosis.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Feb;31(2):311-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1793. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
2
Magnetic [corrected] resonance imaging [corrected] features of the disruption-prone and the disrupted carotid plaque.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jul;2(7):883-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.03.013.
4
Carotid intima media thickness and plaques can predict the occurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular events.
Stroke. 2008 Sep;39(9):2470-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.511584. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
5
Carotid plaque morphology and composition: initial comparison between 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic field strengths.
Radiology. 2008 Aug;248(2):550-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482071114. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
9
Magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis: plaque analysis.
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Oct;18(5):371-8. doi: 10.1097/rmr.0b013e3181598d9d.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验