• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量到底是什么?绩效报告能向消费者清楚地传达护理质量的含义。

What is quality anyway? Performance reports that clearly communicate to consumers the meaning of quality of care.

机构信息

Department of Planning, Public Policy, and Management, University of Oregon, PO Box1209, Eugene, OR 97403-1209, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Jun;67(3):275-93. doi: 10.1177/1077558709356300. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1177/1077558709356300
PMID:20093399
Abstract

While there has been considerable work to identify ways to make the quality measures contained in comparative reports more understandable and digestible for consumers, there has been almost no research looking at ways to make the overall concept of health care quality more understandable and accessible to consumers. In this study, the authors determine the impact of providing a framework for understanding quality on the comprehension and salience of quality information. The study uses an experimental design and tests the effect of providing a framework for describing quality of care, as well as plain language descriptions of quality indicators. The findings indicate that when providing a framework and using plain language to describe quality indicators, consumers were better able to understand and to see greater value in the information, as compared to participants who saw a report that had neither of these attributes. The policy and practice implications are discussed.

摘要

虽然已经有大量工作致力于寻找使比较报告中包含的质量措施更易于消费者理解和消化的方法,但几乎没有研究着眼于使医疗保健质量的整体概念更易于消费者理解和接受的方法。在这项研究中,作者确定了提供理解质量的框架对质量信息的理解和显著性的影响。该研究采用实验设计,测试了提供描述医疗保健质量的框架以及质量指标的通俗易懂的描述的效果。研究结果表明,与既没有这些属性也没有这些属性的报告相比,当提供框架并使用通俗易懂的语言描述质量指标时,消费者能够更好地理解并看到信息的更大价值。讨论了政策和实践的影响。

相似文献

1
What is quality anyway? Performance reports that clearly communicate to consumers the meaning of quality of care.质量到底是什么?绩效报告能向消费者清楚地传达护理质量的含义。
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Jun;67(3):275-93. doi: 10.1177/1077558709356300. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
2
Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers.向消费者提供高质量信息时,少即是多。
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Apr;64(2):169-90. doi: 10.1177/10775587070640020301.
3
Health care consumer reports: an evaluation of consumer perspectives.医疗保健消费者报告:消费者观点评估
J Health Care Finance. 2003 Fall;30(1):65-71.
4
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
5
Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: it isn't just about literacy.消费者能力与比较质量信息的使用:这不仅仅关乎读写能力。
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Aug;64(4):379-94. doi: 10.1177/1077558707301630.
6
Reporting of CAHPS quality information to medicare beneficiaries.向医疗保险受益人报告CAHPS质量信息。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):477-88.
7
Assessing information for consumers on the quality of medical care.为消费者评估医疗服务质量信息。
Inquiry. 1990 Fall;27(3):263-72.
8
Rehabilitation consumers' use and understanding of quality information: a health literacy perspective.康复消费者对质量信息的使用与理解:健康素养视角
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Feb;90(2):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.023.
9
Preventive health information on the Internet. Qualitative study of consumers' perspectives.互联网上的预防性健康信息。消费者观点的定性研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2001 Sep;47:1759-65.
10
Factors influencing health care-seeking behaviours among Mayan women in Guatemala.影响危地马拉玛雅妇女就医行为的因素。
Midwifery. 2009 Aug;25(4):411-21. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.07.011. Epub 2007 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Information usefulness of public disclosure in Taiwan: Does it vary across specific diseases/conditions and contexts?台湾公开披露信息的有用性:它在特定疾病/状况和背景下会有所不同吗?
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 28;20(3):e0310340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310340. eCollection 2025.
2
Separating the wheat from the chaff: How to measure hospital quality in routine data?去芜存菁:如何在常规数据中衡量医院质量?
Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr;59(2):e14282. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14282. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
The elicitation of patient and physician preferences for calculating consumer-based composite measures on hospital report cards: results of two discrete choice experiments.
患者和医生对计算医院报告卡上基于消费者的综合指标的偏好的启发:两项离散选择实验的结果。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):1071-1085. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01650-2. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
4
Referring physicians' intention to use hospital report cards for hospital referral purposes in the presence or absence of patient-reported outcomes: a randomized trial.有(无)患者报告结局时,转诊医师使用医院报告卡进行医院转诊的意向:一项随机试验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Mar;25(2):293-305. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01587-6. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
A composite measure for patient-reported outcomes in orthopedic care: design principles and validity checks.骨科护理中患者报告结局的综合衡量指标:设计原则与有效性检验。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Aug;32(8):2341-2351. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03395-0. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
6
Cost-effectiveness of community health systems strengthening: quality improvement interventions at community level to realise maternal and child health gains in Kenya.社区卫生系统强化的成本效益:肯尼亚社区层面的质量改进干预措施,以实现母婴健康收益。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002452.
7
Mechanisms and impact of public reporting on physicians and hospitals' performance: A systematic review (2000-2020).公众报告对医生和医院绩效的影响机制和影响:系统评价(2000-2020 年)。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0247297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247297. eCollection 2021.
8
Features Constituting Actionable COVID-19 Dashboards: Descriptive Assessment and Expert Appraisal of 158 Public Web-Based COVID-19 Dashboards.具有可操作性的 COVID-19 仪表盘的特征:对 158 个公共网络 COVID-19 仪表盘的描述性评估和专家评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 24;23(2):e25682. doi: 10.2196/25682.
9
Associations between hospital deaths (HSMR), readmission and length of stay (LOS): a longitudinal assessment of performance results and facility characteristics of teaching and large-sized hospitals in Canada between 2013-2014 and 2017-2018.医院死亡率(HSMR)、再入院率和住院时间(LOS)之间的关联:2013-2014 年至 2017-2018 年期间加拿大教学医院和大型医院绩效结果和设施特征的纵向评估。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e041648. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041648.
10
Exploring Types of Information Sources Used When Choosing Doctors: Observational Study in an Online Health Care Community.探索选择医生时使用的信息来源类型:在线医疗社区中的观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 16;22(9):e20910. doi: 10.2196/20910.