Suppr超能文献

血清透明质酸水平不能解释纤维肌痛患者的晨僵现象。

Serum hyaluronic acid levels do not explain morning stiffness in patients with fibromyalgia.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 5 Hak-Dong, Dong-Ku, Gwangju, 501-746, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2010 May;29(5):535-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1372-z. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

Abstract

To investigate the serum levels of hyaluronic acid (HA) in Korean female patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and correlate these levels with variables of disease severity including morning stiffness, we measured HA serum levels in 69 FM patients, 72 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and 71 healthy controls by enzyme-linked binding protein assay. The serum levels of HA in FM patients did not differ from those in the age-matched controls, whereas HA levels were significantly higher in RA patients than in FM patients and controls (both P < 0.001). With a cut-off value of 75 ng/mL, the prevalence of seropositivity was higher in RA patients (59.7%) than in FM patients (26.1%) or controls (14.1%; both P < 0.001). There were no differences in seropositivity between FM patients and controls, or between FM patients with severe symptoms and those with mild symptoms. The HA levels in FM patients were significantly correlated with age, age at diagnosis, age at symptom development, disease duration, symptom duration, and level of education. There were no correlations between HA levels and morning stiffness, tender point counts and scores, or Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Beck Depression Inventory scores. In our patients, the serum HA levels were not increased and did not reflect disease severity. These results suggest that serum HA is not a useful laboratory marker for diagnosis and assessment of FM.

摘要

为了研究韩国纤维肌痛(FM)女性患者血清透明质酸(HA)水平,并将其与疾病严重程度的变量(包括晨僵)相关联,我们通过酶联结合蛋白检测法测量了 69 名 FM 患者、72 名类风湿关节炎(RA)患者和 71 名健康对照者的 HA 血清水平。FM 患者的 HA 血清水平与年龄匹配的对照组无差异,而 RA 患者的 HA 水平明显高于 FM 患者和对照组(均 P<0.001)。以 75ng/mL 为截断值,RA 患者的血清阳性率(59.7%)高于 FM 患者(26.1%)或对照组(14.1%;均 P<0.001)。FM 患者和对照组之间、症状严重的 FM 患者和症状轻微的 FM 患者之间的血清阳性率均无差异。FM 患者的 HA 水平与年龄、诊断年龄、症状出现年龄、病程、症状持续时间和教育水平显著相关。HA 水平与晨僵、压痛点数和评分、纤维肌痛影响问卷、状态特质焦虑量表和贝克抑郁量表评分之间均无相关性。在我们的患者中,血清 HA 水平没有升高,也没有反映疾病严重程度。这些结果表明,血清 HA 不是诊断和评估 FM 的有用实验室标志物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验