Suppr超能文献

数据安全监测委员会:研究问责制的法律和伦理考量。

Data safety monitoring boards: legal and ethical considerations for research accountability.

机构信息

University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.

出版信息

Account Res. 2010 Jan;17(1):30-50. doi: 10.1080/08989620903520313.

Abstract

Those charged with assuring research accountability have little guidance as to how to best structure and manage data safety monitoring boards (DSMBs). One major concern is increased litigation surrounding human subject research which has led research institutions and those asked to serve on DSMBs to seek legal counsel regarding their risk of liability for DSMB activities. A major challenge is assessing the risk of potential liability. Yet, potential liability for DSMBs and their members has not been adequately addressed in the literature. The purpose of this article is to provide a legal and accountability analysis to begin to fill this gap. This article undertakes an analysis and exploration of the potential liability that exists for DSMBs and their members under negligence theory and discusses the means by which DSMBs and their members may avoid litigation or defend themselves in the face of a lawsuit. Research accountability implications of imposing liability, or not, on DSMBs are also considered. It is suggested that legislation be contemplated requiring sponsors to indemnify DSMBs and their members in the face of litigation.

摘要

那些负责确保研究问责制的人对于如何最好地构建和管理数据安全监测委员会(DSMB)几乎没有指导。主要关注的问题之一是围绕人类受试者研究的诉讼不断增加,这导致研究机构和被要求加入 DSMB 的人寻求法律顾问,以了解他们在 DSMB 活动方面的责任风险。一个主要的挑战是评估潜在责任的风险。然而,DSMB 及其成员的潜在责任在文献中尚未得到充分解决。本文的目的是提供法律和问责制分析,开始填补这一空白。本文对疏忽理论下 DSMB 及其成员所承担的潜在责任进行了分析和探讨,并讨论了 DSMB 及其成员在面临诉讼时可以避免诉讼或为自己辩护的方法。还考虑了对 DSMB 施加责任或不施加责任对研究问责制的影响。有人建议考虑立法,要求赞助商在面临诉讼时为 DSMB 及其成员提供赔偿。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验