Suppr超能文献

暴露钛表面的斑块积累和种植体周围组织的行为。一项初步的 1 年临床研究。

Plaque accumulation on exposed titanium surfaces and peri-implant tissue behavior. A preliminary 1-year clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Fixed and Implant Prosthodontics, Genoa University, Genova, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Sep-Oct;22(5):447-55.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate plaque accumulation and peri-implant tissue response adjacent to machined and dual acid-etched (DAE) titanium implant surfaces.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two types of implants were used-control implants with a DAE surface in their apical portion and a machined coronal part, and test implants with a DAE surface throughout their entire length. A total of 10 sets of implants were placed in the posterior quadrants of eight patients, with at least 2 implants (1 control and 1 test implant) placed in each site. Machined healing abutments were placed on the control implants and DAE-surfaced healing abutments on the test implants. Plaque Index and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded together with histologic and microbiologic analyses of the peri-implant tissues. The healing abutments underwent a scanning electron microscope scan at 5 months postsurgery. Standardized radiographs were also taken at the time of implant placement and 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery.

RESULTS

DAE surfaces accumulated more plaque than machined surfaces (P < .0006) and the plaque was assessed as more difficult to remove (P < .0143). No histologic abnormalities were seen and the test implants showed significantly lower crestal bone resorption than the control (P < .0174).

CONCLUSION

DAE healing abutments showed an increased plaque accumulation, but no significant BOP differences or histologic analyses were found between test and control sites. The test implants showed less interproximal bone resorption than the control ones at the end of a 1-year follow-up evaluation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估机加工和双重酸蚀(DAE)钛种植体表面周围的菌斑积累和种植体周围组织反应。

材料和方法

使用两种类型的种植体-对照组种植体,其根尖部分为 DAE 表面,冠部为机加工表面,实验组种植体整个长度均为 DAE 表面。将 10 组种植体分别植入 8 名患者的后象限,每个部位至少植入 2 个种植体(1 个对照组和 1 个实验组)。在对照组种植体上放置机加工愈合基台,在实验组种植体上放置 DAE 表面愈合基台。记录菌斑指数和探诊出血(BOP),并对种植体周围组织进行组织学和微生物学分析。术后 5 个月,对愈合基台进行扫描电子显微镜扫描。种植体植入时、术后 3、6 和 12 个月还拍摄了标准 X 光片。

结果

DAE 表面比机加工表面积累了更多的菌斑(P <.0006),且菌斑更难去除(P <.0143)。未观察到组织学异常,实验组的种植体颊侧骨吸收明显低于对照组(P <.0174)。

结论

DAE 愈合基台菌斑积累增加,但实验组和对照组之间的探诊出血无显著差异,也未发现组织学分析存在差异。在 1 年随访评估结束时,实验组的近中骨吸收明显少于对照组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验