• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手法治疗和物理治疗对亚急性和慢性非特异性颈痛患者的疗效和成本评估。一项随机对照试验(RCT)的原理和设计。

The effectiveness and cost-evaluation of manual therapy and physical therapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic non specific neck pain. Rationale and design of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

机构信息

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Scientific Institute for Quality of Health Care, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jan 24;11:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-14.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-11-14
PMID:20096136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2822827/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Manual Therapy applied to patients with non specific neck pain has been investigated several times. In the Netherlands, manual therapy as applied according to the Utrecht School of Manual Therapy (MTU) has not been the subject of a randomized controlled trial. MTU differs in diagnoses and treatment from other forms of manual therapy.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single blind randomized controlled trial in patients with sub-acute and chronic non specific neck pain. Patients with neck complaints existing for two weeks (minimum) till one year (maximum) will participate in the trial. 180 participants will be recruited in thirteen primary health care centres in the Netherlands.The experimental group will be treated with MTU during a six week period. The control group will be treated with physical therapy (standard care, mainly active exercise therapy), also for a period of six weeks.Primary outcomes are Global Perceived Effect (GPE) and functional status (Neck Disability Index (NDI-DV)). Secondary outcomes are neck pain (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)), Eurocol, costs and quality of life (SF36).

DISCUSSION

This paper presents details on the rationale of MTU, design, methods and operational aspects of the trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00713843.

摘要

背景

针对非特异性颈部疼痛患者的手法治疗已被多次研究。在荷兰,根据乌得勒支手法治疗学派(MTU)实施的手法治疗尚未进行随机对照试验。MTU 在诊断和治疗方面与其他形式的手法治疗不同。

方法/设计:这是一项针对亚急性和慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者的单盲随机对照试验。患有颈部疼痛的患者将参与试验,其症状持续时间为两周(最短)至一年(最长)。将在荷兰的 13 个初级保健中心招募 180 名参与者。实验组将在六周内接受 MTU 治疗。对照组将接受物理治疗(标准护理,主要是主动运动疗法),同样为期六周。主要结局指标是总体感知效果(GPE)和功能状态(颈部残疾指数(NDI-DV))。次要结局指标是颈部疼痛(数字评分量表(NRS))、Eurocol、成本和生活质量(SF36)。

讨论

本文介绍了 MTU 的基本原理、设计、方法和试验操作细节。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00713843。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c54d/2822827/20c37ce38aac/1471-2474-11-14-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c54d/2822827/c84491533fd7/1471-2474-11-14-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c54d/2822827/20c37ce38aac/1471-2474-11-14-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c54d/2822827/c84491533fd7/1471-2474-11-14-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c54d/2822827/20c37ce38aac/1471-2474-11-14-2.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness and cost-evaluation of manual therapy and physical therapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic non specific neck pain. Rationale and design of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).手法治疗和物理治疗对亚急性和慢性非特异性颈痛患者的疗效和成本评估。一项随机对照试验(RCT)的原理和设计。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jan 24;11:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-14.
2
Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial.手法治疗与物理治疗对亚急性和慢性颈部疼痛患者的成本效益:一项随机对照试验
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2087-96. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4526-0. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
3
Comparative effectiveness and economic evaluation of Chuna manual therapy for chronic neck pain: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.中医整脊手法治疗慢性颈痛的比较疗效与经济学评价:一项多中心随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3016-6.
4
Is behavioral graded activity cost-effective in comparison with manual therapy for patients with subacute neck pain? An economic evaluation alongside a randomized clinical trial.行为分级活动与手法治疗相比,对亚急性颈痛患者更具成本效益吗?一项随机临床试验的经济学评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 15;36(18):E1179-86. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820644ed.
5
The effect of massage therapy and/or exercise therapy on subacute or long-lasting neck pain--the Stockholm neck trial (STONE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.按摩疗法和/或运动疗法对亚急性或持续性颈部疼痛的影响——斯德哥尔摩颈部试验(STONE):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Sep 16;16:414. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0926-4.
6
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for nonacute low back pain: study protocol for a pilot multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pCRN study).传统推拿手法治疗与常规护理对非急性下腰痛的比较疗效和成本效益:一项多中心实用随机对照试验(pCRN研究)的试验方案
Trials. 2017 Jan 17;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1756-8.
7
Chuna Manual Therapy vs Usual Care for Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.推拿手法治疗与常规护理治疗非特异性慢性颈痛患者的随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2113757. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13757.
8
Manual therapy compared with physical therapy in patients with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.非特异性颈部疼痛患者中手法治疗与物理治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验
Chiropr Man Therap. 2017 Apr 28;25:12. doi: 10.1186/s12998-017-0141-3. eCollection 2017.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture with Doin therapy for chronic neck pain: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial.针刺蝶腭神经节刺激疗法治疗慢性颈痛的有效性和成本效益:一项多中心、随机对照临床试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 10;9(5):e026632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026632.
10
Is a combined programme of manual therapy and exercise more effective than usual care in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain? A randomized controlled trial.手法治疗与运动相结合的方案是否比常规护理更有效?一项随机对照试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Dec;33(12):1908-1918. doi: 10.1177/0269215519876675. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-Guided vs Non-Guided Pharmacopuncture for Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Multi-Center Prospective Comparative Study Protocol.超声引导与非引导药物穴位注射治疗颈肌筋膜疼痛综合征:一项多中心前瞻性比较研究方案
J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 19;18:1417-1431. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S509236. eCollection 2025.
2
Rehabilitation Strategies for a Patient With Traumatic Multiple Fractures: A Case Report.一名创伤性多发性骨折患者的康复策略:病例报告
Cureus. 2022 Sep 29;14(9):e29732. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29732. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for treating non-specific neck pain: A systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008.颈部功能障碍指数:1991 - 2008年的最新进展
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):491-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006.
2
Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain.非特异性下腰痛患者疼痛强度和功能障碍的最小临床重要变化
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 1;32(25):2915-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b75ae.
3
The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.
手法治疗与运动疗法治疗非特异性颈部疼痛的疗效:一项系统评价。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Nov 6;30(6):1149-1169. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169615.
4
Manual therapy compared with physical therapy in patients with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.非特异性颈部疼痛患者中手法治疗与物理治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验
Chiropr Man Therap. 2017 Apr 28;25:12. doi: 10.1186/s12998-017-0141-3. eCollection 2017.
5
Is manipulative therapy clinically necessary for relief of neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.手法治疗对缓解颈部疼痛在临床上是否必要?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chin J Integr Med. 2017 Jul;23(7):543-554. doi: 10.1007/s11655-016-2506-1. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
6
Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial.手法治疗与物理治疗对亚急性和慢性颈部疼痛患者的成本效益:一项随机对照试验
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2087-96. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4526-0. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
7
Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment.针对颈部疼痛的手法治疗和松动术与非主动对照或另一种主动治疗的对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 23;2015(9):CD004249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004249.pub4.
8
The relative effectiveness of segment specific level and non-specific level spinal joint mobilization on pain and range of motion: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.特定节段水平与非特定节段水平脊柱关节松动术对疼痛和活动范围的相对疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析的结果
J Man Manip Ther. 2013 Feb;21(1):7-17. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000016.
普通人群颈部疼痛的负担及决定因素:2000 - 2010骨与关节十年颈部疼痛及其相关疾病特别工作组的结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S39-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816454c8.
4
Treatment of neck pain: noninvasive interventions: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.颈部疼痛的治疗:非侵入性干预措施:2000 - 2010骨与关节十年颈部疼痛及其相关疾病特别工作组的结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S123-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181644b1d.
5
Minimal clinically important change of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for patients with neck pain.颈部疼痛患者的颈部功能障碍指数和数字评定量表的最小临床重要变化
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 15;32(26):3047-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815cf75b.
6
The benefits outweigh the risks for patients undergoing chiropractic care for neck pain: a prospective, multicenter, cohort study.对于因颈部疼痛接受整脊治疗的患者而言,益处大于风险:一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Jul-Aug;30(6):408-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.04.013.
7
Asymmetry of arm-swing not related to handedness.手臂摆动不对称与用手习惯无关。
Gait Posture. 2008 Apr;27(3):447-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.05.011. Epub 2007 Jul 9.
8
Chronic mechanical neck pain in adults treated by manual therapy: a systematic review of change scores in randomized clinical trials.手法治疗成人慢性机械性颈部疼痛:随机临床试验中变化分数的系统评价
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;30(3):215-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.01.014.
9
Manual therapy for neck pain: an overview of randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.颈部疼痛的手法治疗:随机临床试验与系统评价综述
Eura Medicophys. 2007 Mar;43(1):91-118.
10
Cervical spondylosis and neck pain.颈椎病与颈部疼痛。
BMJ. 2007 Mar 10;334(7592):527-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39127.608299.80.