Technische Universitat Darmstadt, Work and Engineering Psychology, Darmstadt, Germany.
Ergonomics. 2010 Feb;53(2):149-63. doi: 10.1080/00140130903248801.
Human factors in safety is concerned with all those factors that influence people and their behaviour in safety-critical situations. In aviation these are, for example, environmental factors in the cockpit, organisational factors such as shift work, human characteristics such as ability and motivation of staff. Careful consideration of human factors is necessary to improve health and safety at work by optimising the interaction of humans with their technical and social (team, supervisor) work environment. This provides considerable benefits for business by increasing efficiency and by preventing incidents/accidents. The aim of this paper is to suggest management tools for this purpose. Management tools such as balanced scorecards (BSC) are widespread instruments and also well known in aviation organisations. Only a few aviation organisations utilise management tools for human factors although they are the most important conditions in the safety management systems of aviation organisations. One reason for this is that human factors are difficult to measure and therefore also difficult to manage. Studies in other domains, such as workplace health promotion, indicate that BSC-based tools are useful for human factor management. Their mission is to develop a set of indicators that are sensitive to organisational performance and help identify driving forces as well as bottlenecks. Another tool presented in this paper is the Human Resources Performance Model (HPM). HPM facilitates the integrative assessment of human factors programmes on the basis of a systematic performance analysis of the whole system. Cause-effect relationships between system elements are defined in process models in a first step and validated empirically in a second step. Thus, a specific representation of the performance processes is developed, which ranges from individual behaviour to system performance. HPM is more analytic than BSC-based tools because HPM also asks why a certain factor is facilitating or obstructing success. A significant need for research and development is seen here because human factors are of increasing importance for organisational success. This paper suggests integrating human factors in safety management of aviation businesses - a top-ranking partner of technology and finance - and managing it with professional tools. The tools HPM and BSC were identified as potentially useful for this purpose. They were successfully applied in case studies briefly presented in this paper. In terms of specific safety-steering tools in the aviation industry, further elaboration and empirical study is crucial. Statement of Relevance: The importance of human factors is recognised by operators at the sharp end of aviation, where flights are conducted or coordinated. At the blunt end, measurement tools are needed to manage operational resources.
人因安全学关注的是所有影响人员在安全关键情境下的行为和表现的因素。在航空领域,这些因素包括驾驶舱内的环境因素、轮班工作等组织因素、员工的能力和动机等人类特征。为了通过优化人员与其技术和社会(团队、主管)工作环境的相互作用来提高工作场所的健康和安全,必须仔细考虑人因。这为企业带来了巨大的效益,提高了效率,防止了事故/意外的发生。本文旨在为此目的提出管理工具。平衡计分卡(BSC)等管理工具是广泛使用的工具,在航空组织中也广为人知。尽管人因是航空组织安全管理系统中最重要的条件,但只有少数航空组织利用人因管理工具。原因之一是人因难以衡量,因此也难以管理。其他领域的研究,如工作场所健康促进,表明基于 BSC 的工具对于人因管理是有用的。它们的任务是开发一组对组织绩效敏感的指标,帮助识别驱动力和瓶颈。本文还介绍了另一种工具——人力资源绩效模型(HPM)。HPM 基于对整个系统的系统性能分析,促进了人因计划的综合评估。在第一步中,在过程模型中定义系统元素之间的因果关系,并在第二步中通过实证验证。因此,开发了一种特定的绩效过程表示形式,从个体行为到系统性能。HPM 比基于 BSC 的工具更具分析性,因为 HPM 还会询问为什么某个因素会促进或阻碍成功。鉴于人因对组织成功的重要性日益增加,人们认为这方面需要进行大量的研究和开发。本文建议将人因整合到航空企业的安全管理中——这是技术和金融的首要合作伙伴,并使用专业工具进行管理。HPM 和 BSC 被确定为具有潜在用途的工具。本文简要介绍了在案例研究中成功应用这些工具的情况。就航空业的具体安全管理工具而言,进一步的阐述和实证研究至关重要。关联声明:人因的重要性得到了航空业一线操作人员的认可,他们负责飞行的执行或协调。在末端,需要测量工具来管理运营资源。