Suppr超能文献

会议报告:内陆休闲水域微生物标准制定方面的知识与差距

Meeting report: knowledge and gaps in developing microbial criteria for inland recreational waters.

作者信息

Dorevitch Samuel, Ashbolt Nicholas J, Ferguson Christobel M, Fujioka Roger, McGee Charles D, Soller Jeffrey A, Whitman Richard L

机构信息

University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois 60612 , USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Jun;118(6):871-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901627. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has committed to issuing in 2012 new or revised criteria designed to protect the health of those who use surface waters for recreation. For this purpose, the U.S. EPA has been conducting epidemiologic studies to establish relationships between microbial measures of water quality and adverse health outcomes among swimmers. New methods for testing water quality that would provide same-day results will likely be elements of the new criteria. Although the epidemiologic studies upon which the criteria will be based were conducted at Great Lakes and marine beaches, the new water quality criteria may be extended to inland waters (IWs). Similarities and important differences between coastal waters (CWs) and IWs that should be considered when developing criteria for IWs were the focus of an expert workshop. Here, we summarize the state of knowledge and research needed to base IWs microbial criteria on sound science. Two key differences between CWs and IWs are the sources of indicator bacteria, which may modify the relationship between indicator microbes and health risk, and the relationship between indicators and pathogens, which also may vary within IWs. Monitoring using rapid molecular methods will require the standardization and simplification of analytical methods, as well as greater clarity about their interpretation. Research needs for the short term and longer term are described.

摘要

美国环境保护局(EPA)已承诺在2012年发布新的或修订的标准,旨在保护那些利用地表水进行娱乐活动的人的健康。为此,美国环保署一直在进行流行病学研究,以建立水质微生物指标与游泳者不良健康后果之间的关系。能够提供当日检测结果的新水质检测方法可能会成为新标准的一部分。尽管制定这些标准所依据的流行病学研究是在五大湖和海滩进行的,但新的水质标准可能会扩展到内陆水域(IW)。在为内陆水域制定标准时应考虑的沿海水域(CW)和内陆水域之间的异同,是一次专家研讨会的重点。在此,我们总结了基于可靠科学制定内陆水域微生物标准所需的知识和研究现状。沿海水域和内陆水域之间的两个关键差异在于指示菌的来源,这可能会改变指示微生物与健康风险之间的关系,以及指示菌与病原体之间的关系,这种关系在内陆水域中也可能有所不同。使用快速分子方法进行监测将需要对分析方法进行标准化和简化,以及对其解释有更清晰的认识。文中描述了短期和长期的研究需求。

相似文献

7
U.S. Recreational Water Quality Criteria: A Vision for the Future.美国休闲用水水质标准:未来展望。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jul 9;12(7):7752-76. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120707752.

引用本文的文献

2
U.S. Recreational Water Quality Criteria: A Vision for the Future.美国休闲用水水质标准:未来展望。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jul 9;12(7):7752-76. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120707752.
3
Enterococci in the environment.环境中的肠球菌。
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012 Dec;76(4):685-706. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00023-12.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验