Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Bernhard-Nocht-Str, 74, 20359 Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Genomics. 2010 Jan 26;11:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-63.
The availability of two genetically very similar cell lines (A and B) derived from the laboratory isolate Entamoeba histolytica HM-1:IMSS, which differ in their virulence properties, provides a powerful tool for identifying pathogenicity factors of the causative agent of human amoebiasis. Cell line A is incapable inducing liver abscesses in gerbils, whereas interaction with cell line B leads to considerable abscess formation. Phenotypic characterization of both cell lines revealed that trophozoites from the pathogenic cell line B have a larger cell size, an increased growth rate in vitro, an increased cysteine peptidase activity and higher resistance to nitric oxide stress. To find proteins that may serve as virulence factors, the proteomes of both cell lines were previously studied, resulting in the identification of a limited number of differentially synthesized proteins. This study aims to identify additional genes, serving as virulence factors, or virulence markers.
To obtain a comprehensive picture of the differences between the cell lines, we compared their transcriptomes using an oligonucleotide-based microarray and confirmed findings with quantitative real-time PCR. Out of 6242 genes represented on the array, 87 are differentially transcribed (> or = two-fold) in the two cell lines. Approximately 50% code for hypothetical proteins. Interestingly, only 19 genes show a five-fold or higher differential expression. These include three rab7 GTPases, which were found with a higher abundance in the non-pathogenic cell line A. The aig1-like GTPasesare of special interest because the majority of them show higher levels of transcription in the pathogenic cell line B. Only two molecules were found to be differentially expressed between the two cell lines in both this study and our previous proteomic approach.
In this study we have identified a defined set of genes that are differentially transcribed between the non-pathogenic cell line A and the pathogenic cell line B of E. histolytica. The identification of transcription profiles unique for amoebic cell lines with pathogenic phenotypes may help to elucidate the transcriptional framework of E. histolytica pathogenicity and serve as a basis for identifying transcriptional markers and virulence factors.
两种遗传上非常相似的细胞系(A 和 B)来自实验室分离株 Entamoeba histolytica HM-1:IMSS,它们在毒力特性上有所不同,这为鉴定人类阿米巴病病原体的致病因素提供了有力工具。细胞系 A 不能在沙鼠中诱导肝脓肿,而与细胞系 B 相互作用会导致大量脓肿形成。对两种细胞系的表型特征进行了表征,结果表明,来自致病性细胞系 B 的滋养体具有更大的细胞大小、体外生长速度增加、半胱氨酸蛋白酶活性增加和对一氧化氮应激的抵抗力增加。为了寻找可能作为毒力因子的蛋白质,先前研究了两种细胞系的蛋白质组,结果鉴定出数量有限的差异合成蛋白质。本研究旨在鉴定更多作为毒力因子或毒力标志物的基因。
为了全面了解细胞系之间的差异,我们使用基于寡核苷酸的微阵列比较了它们的转录组,并使用定量实时 PCR 验证了发现结果。在阵列上代表的 6242 个基因中,有 87 个在两种细胞系中差异转录(>或=两倍)。大约 50%编码假设蛋白。有趣的是,只有 19 个基因表现出五倍或更高的差异表达。其中包括三种 rab7 GTPases,它们在非致病性细胞系 A 中丰度更高。aig1 样 GTPases 特别有趣,因为它们中的大多数在致病性细胞系 B 中转录水平更高。在这项研究和我们之前的蛋白质组学方法中,只有两种分子在两种细胞系之间表现出差异表达。
在这项研究中,我们已经确定了一组在非致病性细胞系 A 和致病性细胞系 B 之间差异转录的基因。鉴定具有致病性表型的阿米巴细胞系的独特转录谱可能有助于阐明 E. histolytica 致病性的转录框架,并作为鉴定转录标记物和毒力因子的基础。