Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, London W6 8RP, UK.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jan 26;11:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-17.
The life-time incidence of low back pain is high and diagnoses of spinal stenosis and disc prolapse are increasing. Consequently, there is a steady rise in surgical interventions for these conditions. Current evidence suggests that while the success of surgery is incomplete, it is superior to conservative interventions. A recent survey indicates that there are large differences in the type and intensity of rehabilitation, if any, provided after spinal surgery as well as in the restrictions and advice given to patients in the post-operative period. This trial will test the hypothesis that functional outcome following two common spinal operations can be improved by a programme of post-operative rehabilitation that combines professional support and advice with graded active exercise and/or an educational booklet based on evidence-based messages and advice.
METHODS/DESIGN: The study design is a multi-centre, factorial, randomised controlled trial with patients stratified by surgeon and operative procedure. The trial will compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a rehabilitation programme and an education booklet for the postoperative management of patients undergoing discectomy or lateral nerve root decompression, each compared with "usual care"using a 2 x 2 factorial design. The trial will create 4 sub-groups; rehabilitation-only, booklet-only, rehabilitation-plus-booklet, and usual care only. The trial aims to recruit 344 patients, which equates to 86 patients in each of the four sub-groups. All patients will be assessed for functional ability (through the Oswestry Disability Index - a disease specific functional questionnaire), pain (using visual analogue scales), and satisfaction pre-operatively and then at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 9 months and 1 year post-operatively. This will be complemented by a formal analysis of cost-effectiveness.
This trial will determine whether the outcome of spinal surgery can be enhanced by either a post-operative rehabilitation programme or an evidence-based advice booklet or a combination of the two and as such will contribute to our knowledge on how to manage spinal surgery patients in the post-operative period.
腰痛的终身发病率很高,且脊柱狭窄和椎间盘突出的诊断也在增加。因此,针对这些疾病的手术干预数量稳步上升。目前的证据表明,尽管手术的成功率并不完全,但它优于保守治疗。最近的一项调查表明,脊柱手术后提供的康复类型和强度(如果有的话)以及在术后期间向患者提供的限制和建议存在很大差异。本试验将检验以下假设:通过将专业支持和建议与分级主动运动相结合的术后康复方案,或基于循证信息和建议的教育手册,可以改善两种常见脊柱手术的术后功能结果。
方法/设计:该研究设计是一项多中心、两因素、随机对照试验,患者按外科医生和手术方式分层。该试验将比较椎间盘切除术或侧神经根减压术后患者的康复方案和教育手册的有效性和成本效益,每种方案与“常规护理”相比,采用 2 x 2 析因设计。试验将创建 4 个亚组:仅康复、仅手册、康复加手册和仅常规护理。该试验旨在招募 344 名患者,每个亚组有 86 名患者。所有患者在术前、术后 6 周、3 个月、6 个月和 9 个月及 1 年时,将通过功能能力(通过 Oswestry 残疾指数-一种特定于疾病的功能问卷)、疼痛(使用视觉模拟量表)和满意度进行评估。这将与正式的成本效益分析相辅相成。
本试验将确定术后康复方案或基于循证信息和建议的教育手册,或两者的结合是否可以改善脊柱手术的结果,从而为我们提供如何在术后管理脊柱手术患者的知识。