• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎管狭窄症显微减压术后的疼痛与功能结局:极短期和长期术后分析

Pain and Functional Outcome After Microsurgical Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Very Short- and Long-Term Postoperative Analysis.

作者信息

Graebsch Carolin, Buser Zorica, Leroy Sophie, Wang Jeffrey C, Yoon Tim, Bone Stefan, Meisel Hans Jörg, Schenk Philipp

机构信息

Department of Science, Research and Education, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle, Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2025 Jan 30:21925682251316557. doi: 10.1177/21925682251316557.

DOI:10.1177/21925682251316557
PMID:39883027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11783404/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

109 patients with lumbar spine stenosis (LSS) undergoing minimally invasive decompression in 6 different centers (Germany, Italy, USA).

METHODS

The demographic, surgical and clinical data was collected. Patients were examined preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, at 6 and 12 months after surgery with regard to pain (back and legs) and functional outcomes (ODI, SF-36, EQ5D).

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 67 ± 11 years, with a BMI of 31.8 ± 6.6 kg/m². Most patients (93%) underwent single-level decompression, and postoperative adverse events occurred in 17% of cases. Significant initial reductions in back (6.0 ± 2.8 to 2.4 ± 2.1) and leg pain (6.4 ± 2.1 to 2.1 ± 2.5) were observed ( < 0.001). However, pain levels increased significantly by the 12-month period, reaching 3.9 ± 2.7 for back pain and 3.9 ± 2.4 for leg pain ( < 0.001). Functional scores (ODI) improved from 43 ± 18 at baseline to 36 ± 18 post-treatment but showed no further significant change ( = 0.509) by 12 months. Health status (EQ5D index) improved from 0.53 ± 0.33 to 0.82 ± 0.16 immediately post-treatment but declined to 0.75 ± 0.21 by 12 months ( = 0.011). SF36 physical scores also showed initial improvement but plateaued at follow-ups. Notably, high BMI and prior spine surgery were associated with worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Although minimally invasive decompression without fusion initially led to a significant improvement in patients with LSS, the results deteriorated significantly over the course of the observation period. Future studies should focus on strategies to ensure sustained improvement in symptoms in patients with lumbar stenosis undergoing decompression procedure.

摘要

研究设计

多中心前瞻性观察队列研究。

研究对象

109例腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者,在6个不同中心(德国、意大利、美国)接受微创减压手术。

方法

收集人口统计学、手术及临床数据。在术前、术后即刻、术后6个月和12个月对患者进行疼痛(背部和腿部)及功能结局(ODI、SF - 36、EQ5D)检查。

结果

该队列的平均年龄为67±11岁,体重指数为31.8±6.6kg/m²。大多数患者(93%)接受了单节段减压,17%的病例发生了术后不良事件。观察到背部疼痛(从6.0±2.8降至2.4±2.1)和腿部疼痛(从6.4±2.1降至2.1±2.5)在术后初期显著减轻(P<0.001)。然而,到12个月时疼痛水平显著增加,背痛达到3.9±2.7,腿痛达到3.9±2.4(P<0.001)。功能评分(ODI)从基线时的43±18改善至治疗后的36±18,但到12个月时无进一步显著变化(P = 0.509)。健康状况(EQ5D指数)在治疗后即刻从0.53±0.33改善至0.82±0.16,但到12个月时降至0.75±0.21(P = 0.011)。SF36身体评分在术后初期也有所改善,但在随访时趋于平稳。值得注意的是,高体重指数和既往脊柱手术与较差的结局相关。

结论

尽管无融合的微创减压术最初使腰椎管狭窄症患者有显著改善,但在观察期内结果显著恶化。未来研究应聚焦于确保接受减压手术的腰椎管狭窄症患者症状持续改善的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/11783404/d657595de826/10.1177_21925682251316557-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/11783404/d657595de826/10.1177_21925682251316557-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/11783404/d657595de826/10.1177_21925682251316557-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Pain and Functional Outcome After Microsurgical Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Very Short- and Long-Term Postoperative Analysis.腰椎管狭窄症显微减压术后的疼痛与功能结局:极短期和长期术后分析
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan 30:21925682251316557. doi: 10.1177/21925682251316557.
2
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD012421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012421.
3
Rehabilitation following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症手术后的康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 9;2013(12):CD009644. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009644.pub2.
4
Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;2016(1):CD010264. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010264.pub2.
5
The Role of Endoscopic Spinal Decompression Surgery in Amelioration of Disability in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.内镜下脊柱减压手术在改善腰椎管狭窄症患者残疾状况中的作用。
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2025 Apr 30;27(2):45-52. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0055.2405.
6
Midline-preserving vs. midline-removing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: national registry study based on the Finnish spine registry (FinSpine).腰椎管狭窄症的保留中线与切除中线手术:基于芬兰脊柱注册中心(FinSpine)的全国注册研究
Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09271-4.
7
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and muscle injury in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal spinal surgery, unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery, and percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy: a six-month follow-up.关节镜辅助单通道脊柱手术、单侧双通道内镜手术和经皮椎间孔腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的短期临床疗效及肌肉损伤比较:六个月随访
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 21;20(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06088-1.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Interlaminar Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study of 176 Cases With a 3-6 Year Follow-Up.
Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1111/os.70131.
9
Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯减压与减压融合治疗退行性腰椎滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):1054-1067. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07507-1. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
10
Does the Sagittal Balance Influence Microsurgical Results for Spinal Stenosis?: A Prospective 4-Year Follow-Up.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Aug 15;50(16):1145-1152. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005195. Epub 2025 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative Health Status and Clinical Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life Improvement After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery: A Longitudinal Study.腰椎管狭窄症手术后健康相关生活质量改善的术前健康状况及临床预测因素:一项纵向研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 20;14(13):4391. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134391.

本文引用的文献

1
Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: five-year clinical results from a randomized clinical trial.单纯减压或减压融合治疗腰椎管狭窄症:一项随机临床试验的 5 年临床结果。
Bone Joint J. 2024 Jul 1;106-B(7):705-712. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1160.R2.
2
Full-endoscopic versus microscopic spinal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review & meta-analysis.全内镜与显微镜下减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2024 Jun;24(6):1022-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.12.009. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
3
Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
单纯减压与减压融合治疗退行性腰椎滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):1054-1067. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07507-1. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
4
Incidence of Revision Surgery After Decompression With vs Without Fusion Among Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.退变性腰椎管狭窄症减压术后与未融合患者行翻修手术的发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2223803. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23803.
5
How Decompression Surgery Improves the Lower Back Pain in Patient with Lumbar Degenerative Stenosis: A Propensity-score-matched Analysis.减压手术如何改善腰椎退行性狭窄患者的下腰痛:倾向评分匹配分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Apr 1;47(7):557-564. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004265.
6
Prediction of walking ability following posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.预测腰椎管狭窄后路减压术后的步行能力。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Nov;30(11):3307-3318. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06938-6. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
7
Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.退变性腰椎滑脱症的减压融合与非融合。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):526-538. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990.
8
Pre-operative prognostic factors for walking capacity after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.腰椎狭窄症手术后步行能力的术前预后因素:系统评价。
Age Ageing. 2021 Sep 11;50(5):1529-1545. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab150.
9
Concomitant back and leg pain as predictors for trajectories of poor outcome after single level lumbar micro-decompression alone and with micro-discectomy: a study of 3,308 patients.单纯单节段腰椎微减压术及联合微椎间盘切除术时,同时存在的背部和腿部疼痛作为预后不良轨迹的预测因素:一项对3308例患者的研究
J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):688-702. doi: 10.21037/jss-19-462.
10
Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery: A Review of 2699 Cases.腰椎减压手术后患者报告的结局:2699例病例的综述
Global Spine J. 2021 Mar;11(2):172-179. doi: 10.1177/2192568219896541. Epub 2020 Jan 7.