Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Spain.
Br J Nutr. 2010 Jun;103(12):1808-16. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509993837. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
The aim of the present study was to assess reproducibility and relative validity of a self-administered FFQ used in the PREDIMED Study, a clinical trial for primary prevention of CVD by Mediterranean diet in a population at high cardiovascular risk. The FFQ was administered twice (FFQ1 and FFQ2) to explore reproducibility at 1 year. Four 3 d dietary records (DR) were used as reference to explore validity; participants therefore recorded their food intake over 12 d in the course of 1 year. The degree of misclassification in the FFQ was also evaluated by a contingency table of quintiles comparing the information from the FFQ2 and the DR. A total of 158 men and women (aged 55-80 years) were asked not to modify their dietary habits during the study period. Reproducibility for food groups, energy and nutrient intake, explored by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) ranged 0.50-0.82, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.63 to 0.90. The FFQ2 tended to report higher energy and nutrient intake than the DR. The validity indices of the FFQ in relation to the DR for food groups and energy and nutrient intake ranged (r) from 0.24 to 0.72, while the range of the ICC was between 0.40 and 0.84. With regard to food groups, 68-83 % of individuals were in the same or adjacent quintile in both methods, a figure which decreased to 55-75 % for energy and nutrient intake. We concluded that FFQ measurements had good reproducibility and a relative validity similar to those of FFQ used in other prospective studies.
本研究旨在评估 PREDIMED 研究中使用的自我管理式食物频率问卷(FFQ)的再现性和相对有效性,该研究是一项针对心血管疾病高危人群的地中海饮食初级预防的临床试验。FFQ 进行了两次(FFQ1 和 FFQ2)以探索 1 年内的再现性。使用四个 3 天的饮食记录(DR)作为参考,以探索有效性;因此,参与者在 1 年内的 12 天内记录了他们的食物摄入量。还通过比较 FFQ2 和 DR 的五分位数的列联表评估 FFQ 的分类错误程度。共有 158 名年龄在 55-80 岁的男性和女性被要求在研究期间不要改变他们的饮食习惯。通过 Pearson 相关系数(r)探索食物组、能量和营养素摄入量的再现性范围为 0.50-0.82,组内相关系数(ICC)范围为 0.63-0.90。FFQ2 倾向于报告比 DR 更高的能量和营养素摄入量。FFQ 与 DR 之间关于食物组和能量及营养素摄入量的有效性指数(r)范围为 0.24-0.72,而 ICC 的范围在 0.40-0.84 之间。关于食物组,68-83%的个体在两种方法中处于相同或相邻的五分位数,而能量和营养素摄入量的比例降至 55-75%。我们得出结论,FFQ 测量具有良好的再现性和相对有效性,与其他前瞻性研究中使用的 FFQ 相似。