Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Am J Surg. 2010 Jan;199(1):94-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.016.
The aim of this study was to compare the laboratory teaching of a basic technical skill by a nonphysician skills coach and a faculty surgeon.
Medical students were randomized to instruction of skin suturing in the skills laboratory by a faculty surgeon or by a nonphysician skills coach. Testing of performance occurred at 3 time points. Other faculty surgeons, blinded to identities and training groups, rated performance.
Forty-nine students participated. Baseline fourth-year student mean scores showed no significant difference between training groups. Third-year and fourth-year student performance showed no difference between training groups on postintervention testing. Delayed testing also showed no difference in third-year student scores.
Training by either a nonsurgeon skills coach or a faculty surgeon resulted in no difference in performance on a basic surgical skill. This was true for students with and without prior experience and was also true after subsequent clinical experiences. Nonphysician coaches may ease the teaching burden of surgical faculty members while providing similar quality of instruction for trainees.
本研究旨在比较非医师技能教练和外科教员在基础技术技能实验室教学中的效果。
将医学生随机分为由外科教员或非医师技能教练在技能实验室中进行皮肤缝合教学。在三个时间点进行操作技能测试。其他外科教员对操作表现进行盲法评估,而不知道培训组的身份。
共有 49 名学生参与。基线四年级学生平均成绩显示培训组之间无显著差异。干预后测试中,三年级和四年级学生的表现也没有差异。三年级学生的延迟测试分数也没有差异。
无论是由非外科医生技能教练还是外科教员进行培训,在基础外科技能的表现上都没有差异。这对于有和没有先前经验的学生都是如此,并且在随后的临床经验之后也是如此。非医师教练可以减轻外科教员的教学负担,同时为学员提供类似质量的指导。