School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Feb;24(2):149-58. doi: 10.1177/0269215509346103.
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used physical tests for subacromial impingement syndrome, using ultrasound as the reference standard.
A cross-sectional study of 59 participants with chronic shoulder pain of more than four months duration with a referral for diagnostic ultrasound scanning were invited to participate in the study.
Thirty-four participants met the inclusion criteria and had an ultrasound scan followed immediately by application of the following tests: Neer's sign, Hawkins and Kennedy test, painful arc of abduction, empty and full can tests, resisted isometric shoulder abduction and resisted isometric shoulder external rotation. Using the two-way contingency table method sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and overall accuracy were calculated for each physical test.
Diagnostic values for each test varied considerably. The Hawkins and Kennedy test was the most accurate test for diagnosing any degree of subacromial impingement syndrome (71.0%). The most accurate tests for diagnosing subcategories of impingement were pain on resisted external rotation and weakness during the full can test (63.6%) for presence of subdeltoid fluid, pain on resisted external rotation (58.8%) for partial thickness tears and the painful arc test (62.1%) for full thickness tears.
As the predictive values of these tests are shown to be variable in this study it indicates that the clinical tests identified have limited use in informing diagnosis. Emphasis on the management of dysfunction may be more appropriate rather than reliance on clinical tests with inconclusive sensitivity and specificity if ultrasound scanning is not available.
以超声为参照标准,确定常用于肩峰下撞击综合征的体格检查的诊断准确性。
对 59 名患有慢性肩部疼痛超过 4 个月且有诊断性超声扫描转诊的参与者进行横断面研究,邀请他们参与研究。
34 名参与者符合纳入标准,并进行了超声扫描,随后立即进行以下检查:Neer 征、Hawkins 和 Kennedy 试验、外展痛弧、空罐和满罐试验、抗阻力等长肩外展、抗阻力等长肩外旋。使用双向列联表法,计算每个体格检查的敏感度、特异度、似然比和总准确性。
每个检查的诊断价值差异很大。Hawkins 和 Kennedy 试验是诊断任何程度肩峰下撞击综合征最准确的试验(71.0%)。诊断撞击亚类的最准确试验是抗阻力外旋时疼痛和满罐试验时无力(提示三角肌下间隙积液)(63.6%)、抗阻力外旋时疼痛(提示部分厚度撕裂)(58.8%)和疼痛弧试验(提示全厚度撕裂)(62.1%)。
由于本研究中这些检查的预测值各不相同,表明临床检查的用途有限,无法明确诊断。如果无法进行超声扫描,强调功能障碍的管理可能比依赖敏感度和特异度不确定的临床检查更为合适。