• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断难题:与磁共振成像相比,哪些临床检查对诊断冈上肌撕裂和肌腱病最为准确?

Diagnostic Dilemma: Which Clinical Tests Are Most Accurate for Diagnosing Supraspinatus Muscle Tears and Tendinosis When Compared to Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

作者信息

Balevi Batur Elif, Bekin Sarıkaya Pelin Zeynep, Kaygısız Mustafa Emin, Albayrak Gezer Ilknur, Levendoglu Funda

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya, TUR.

Radiology, Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, Kırıkkale, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jun 13;14(6):e25903. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25903. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.25903
PMID:35844349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9278872/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of five clinical shoulder tests in the diagnosis of supraspinatus tears and tendinosis when compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A total of 116 shoulders of 106 consecutive patients who experienced shoulder pain were assessed for this cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. Patients were assessed with the most commonly used clinical shoulder tests, including the Jobe test (empty can), Neer test, drop arm test, Hawkins test, and full can test to identify supraspinatus tears and tendinosis. MRI examinations were performed on a 1.5 Tesla MRI system, and images were assessed by a blinded radiologist. The primary outcomes were to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the five clinical tests and to establish their correlation with MRI for supraspinatus tears and tendinosis.

RESULTS

The Hawkins test had a higher sensitivity and accuracy when diagnosing tears (sensitivity 89.66% [95% CI, 78.83-96.11] and accuracy 56.03% [95% CI, 46.51-65.23], respectively) and higher sensitivity in tendinosis (79.07% [95% CI, 63.96-89.96]). The drop arm test had a lower sensitivity but higher specificity in both tendinosis and tears (sensitivity 0% [95% CI, 0-8.22] and 12.07% [95% CI, 4.99-23.29], respectively, and specificity 87.67% [95% CI, 77.88-94.21] and 96.5% [95% CI, 88.09-99.58], respectively). The Neer test had a higher positive predictive value (PPV) of 37.21% in diagnosing tendinosis. When compared to the Hawkins test, the combination of the clinical tests had no statistically significant contribution to sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The Hawkins test had higher accuracy in diagnosing tears and was the most sensitive in diagnosing supraspinatus tendinosis and tears when compared to the MRI findings. The Neer test may also be another reliable tool for the diagnosis of tendinosis due to its higher PPV.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨五项临床肩部检查与磁共振成像(MRI)相比,在诊断冈上肌撕裂和肌腱病方面的诊断准确性。

方法

对连续106例肩部疼痛患者的116个肩部进行了这项横断面诊断准确性研究。对患者进行了最常用的临床肩部检查,包括乔布试验(空罐试验)、尼尔试验、落臂试验、霍金斯试验和全罐试验,以确定冈上肌撕裂和肌腱病。在1.5特斯拉MRI系统上进行MRI检查,图像由一名不知情的放射科医生评估。主要结果是确定五项临床检查的敏感性、特异性和准确性,并确定它们与MRI诊断冈上肌撕裂和肌腱病的相关性。

结果

霍金斯试验在诊断撕裂时具有较高的敏感性和准确性(敏感性分别为89.66%[95%CI,78.83 - 96.11]和准确性为56.03%[95%CI,46.51 - 65.23]),在诊断肌腱病时具有较高的敏感性(79.07%[95%CI,63.96 - 89.96])。落臂试验在肌腱病和撕裂中的敏感性较低,但特异性较高(在肌腱病和撕裂中的敏感性分别为0%[95%CI,0 - 8.22]和12.07%[95%CI,4.99 - 23.29],特异性分别为87.67%[95%CI,77.88 - 94.21]和96.5%[95%CI,88.09 - 99.58])。尼尔试验在诊断肌腱病时具有较高的阳性预测值(PPV),为37.21%。与霍金斯试验相比,临床检查的联合对敏感性和诊断准确性没有统计学上的显著贡献。

结论

与MRI结果相比,霍金斯试验在诊断撕裂时准确性更高,在诊断冈上肌腱病和撕裂时最敏感。由于尼尔试验具有较高的PPV,它也可能是诊断肌腱病的另一种可靠工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef9f/9278872/4f1ae2af201b/cureus-0014-00000025903-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef9f/9278872/4f1ae2af201b/cureus-0014-00000025903-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef9f/9278872/4f1ae2af201b/cureus-0014-00000025903-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Dilemma: Which Clinical Tests Are Most Accurate for Diagnosing Supraspinatus Muscle Tears and Tendinosis When Compared to Magnetic Resonance Imaging?诊断难题:与磁共振成像相比,哪些临床检查对诊断冈上肌撕裂和肌腱病最为准确?
Cureus. 2022 Jun 13;14(6):e25903. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25903. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Comparing shoulder maneuvers to magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in patients with supraspinatus tears.比较肩袖撕裂患者的肩部手法检查与磁共振成像及关节镜检查结果。
World J Orthop. 2022 Jan 18;13(1):102-111. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.102.
3
Supraspinatus tears: predictability of magnetic resonance imaging findings based on clinical examination.肩袖撕裂:基于临床检查的磁共振成像表现的预测性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Aug;30(8):1834-1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
[Diagnostic value of physical examination tests for supraspinatus tendon tears].[体格检查对冈上肌腱撕裂的诊断价值]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 Mar 25;35(3):220-4. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.03.005.
5
Diagnostic Value of Clinical Tests for Supraspinatus Tendon Tears.肩袖肌腱撕裂的临床检查诊断价值。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2326-2333. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.030. Epub 2018 May 22.
6
The Hug-up Test: A New, Sensitive Diagnostic Test for Supraspinatus Tears.拥抱试验:一种用于检测冈上肌撕裂的新型敏感诊断试验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jan 20;129(2):147-53. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.173461.
7
Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in diagnosing supraspinatus lesions: a prospective accuracy diagnostic study.超声检查诊断冈上肌损伤的敏感性和特异性:一项前瞻性准确性诊断研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2018 Jul-Aug;136(4):292-297. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0069170418. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
8
Accuracy of shoulder ultrasound examination for diagnosis of rotator cuff pathologies: a single-center retrospective study.肩部超声检查诊断肩袖病变的准确性:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 May-Jun;39(3):162-171. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.162. Epub 2019 May 30.
9
Application Value of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography of the Shoulder in Nursing and Diagnosis of Patients with Shoulder Joint Injury.磁共振关节造影在肩关节损伤患者护理及诊断中的应用价值。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Aug 23;2021:3051578. doi: 10.1155/2021/3051578. eCollection 2021.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome.不同程度肩峰下撞击综合征临床检查的诊断准确性
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jul;87(7):1446-55. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02335.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Adding a Pain Neuroscience Education Program to a Multimodal Physiotherapy Intervention in Patients with Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在慢性肩痛患者的多模式物理治疗干预中增加疼痛神经科学教育计划的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 27;15(2):125. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15020125.

本文引用的文献

1
Supraspinatus tendon thickness and subacromial impingement characteristics in younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人的冈上肌腱厚度和肩峰下撞击特征。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 11;23(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05179-y.
2
Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis, MRI, and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Shoulder Pathology.临床诊断、MRI与关节镜检查在肩部病变诊断中的相关性
Cureus. 2021 Dec 23;13(12):e20654. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20654. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Shoulder Rotator Cuff Disorders: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Semantic Analyses of Recommendations.
肩袖肌腱疾病:临床实践指南的系统评价和推荐意见的语义分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul;101(7):1233-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
4
Diagnostic Value of Clinical Tests for Supraspinatus Tendon Tears.肩袖肌腱撕裂的临床检查诊断价值。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2326-2333. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.030. Epub 2018 May 22.
5
Surgery for subacromial impingement syndrome in relation to occupational exposures, lifestyle factors and diabetes mellitus: a nationwide nested case-control study.与职业暴露、生活方式因素及糖尿病相关的肩峰下撞击综合征手术:一项全国性巢式病例对照研究
Occup Environ Med. 2017 Oct;74(10):728-736. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104272. Epub 2017 May 10.
6
Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.肩部体格检查测试:诊断测试性能的系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jan 25;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1400-0.
7
Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis.敏感性和特异性分析的最小样本量要求。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct;10(10):YE01-YE06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18129.8744. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
8
Characterization of Rotator Cuff Tears: Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging.肩袖撕裂的特征:超声与磁共振成像对比
Orthopedics. 2017 Jan 1;40(1):e124-e130. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20161013-04. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Special Tests for Rotator Cuff Tear: The ROW Cohort Study.肩袖撕裂特殊检查的诊断准确性:ROW队列研究。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Mar;96(3):176-183. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000566.
10
Prevalence of abnormalities on shoulder MRI in symptomatic and asymptomatic older adults.有症状和无症状的老年人肩部MRI异常的患病率。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2014 Nov;17(8):863-71. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12476. Epub 2014 Oct 8.