Suppr超能文献

中国农村地区的血液供应安全性。

Safety of the blood supply in a rural area of China.

机构信息

National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Feb;53 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S23-6. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c7d494.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and syphilis conducted by laboratories of 3 blood collection organizations in a rural area of China.

METHODS

From October to December 2003, 1068 samples were collected from blood donors presenting to the 3 collection centers. All samples were tested twice using 2 different test kits for HBsAg, HCV, and syphilis. An aliquot was sent to the China National Center for Clinical Laboratories to confirm the local test results. Sensitivities and specificities of the 3 local blood centers/banks were calculated using the results of the National Center for Clinical Laboratories as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the 3 blood collection center/banks ranged from 0% to 63.2% for HBsAg. For HCV, the sensitivity was 0%, and for syphilis, ranged from 0% to 85.7%. There were no HBsAg positives in one of the blood center/banks, and no syphilis positives in the other. Thus, sensitivity could not be measured for these tests in these 2 facilities. Combining all 3 tests, the overall sensitivity was 55.6%. The specificity was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of the local laboratories was inadequate and could cause possible infection for an unacceptable number of blood recipients. Action needs to be taken to improve the quality of testing to ensure the safety of the rural blood supply.

摘要

目的

确定中国农村地区 3 家采血机构实验室进行乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和梅毒检测的灵敏度和特异性。

方法

2003 年 10 月至 12 月,从 3 个采血中心采集了 1068 份献血者样本。所有样本均使用 2 种不同的 HBsAg、HCV 和梅毒检测试剂盒进行了 2 次检测。将一份样本送到中国国家临床实验室中心以确认当地的检测结果。使用国家临床实验室中心的结果作为金标准,计算了 3 家当地血站/血库的灵敏度和特异性。

结果

3 家采血中心/血库的 HBsAg 灵敏度从 0%到 63.2%不等。对于 HCV,灵敏度为 0%,而梅毒的灵敏度从 0%到 85.7%不等。其中一家血站/血库没有 HBsAg 阳性,另一家没有梅毒阳性。因此,这 2 家机构无法对这些检测进行灵敏度测量。综合所有 3 项检测,总体灵敏度为 55.6%。特异性为 100%。

结论

当地实验室的灵敏度不足,可能导致大量不可接受的血液受血者感染。需要采取行动提高检测质量,以确保农村血液供应的安全性。

相似文献

1
Safety of the blood supply in a rural area of China.中国农村地区的血液供应安全性。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Feb;53 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S23-6. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c7d494.

本文引用的文献

2
Public health. HIV testing in China.公共卫生。中国的艾滋病毒检测。
Science. 2006 Jun 9;312(5779):1475-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1120682.
7
Plasma collection and donor safety in rural China.中国农村地区的血浆采集与献血者安全。
J Infect Dis. 2005 Nov 15;192(10):1681-2. doi: 10.1086/497154. Epub 2005 Oct 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验