Suppr超能文献

初始腹腔镜阑尾切除术与初始非手术治疗和脓肿穿孔性阑尾炎间隔阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机试验。

Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial nonoperative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trial.

机构信息

Center for Prospective Clinical Trials, The Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan;45(1):236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.039.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Perforated appendicitis is a common condition in children, which, in a small number of patients, may be complicated by a well-formed abscess. Initial nonoperative management with percutaneous drainage/aspiration of the abscess followed by intravenous antibiotics usually allows for an uneventful interval appendectomy. Although this strategy has become well accepted, there are no published data comparing initial nonoperative management (drainage/interval appendectomy) to appendectomy upon presentation with an abscess. Therefore, we conducted a randomized trial comparing these 2 management strategies.

METHODS

After internal review board approval (#06 11-164), children who presented with a well-defined abdominal abscess by computed tomographic imaging were randomized on admission to laparoscopic appendectomy or intravenous antibiotics with percutaneous drainage of the abscess (when possible), followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy approximately 10 weeks later. This was a pilot study with a sample size of 40, which was based on our recent volume of patients presenting with appendicitis and abscess.

RESULTS

On presentation, there were no differences between the 2 groups regarding age, weight, body mass index, sex distribution, temperature, leukocyte count, number of abscesses, or greatest 2-dimensional area of abscess in the axial view. Regarding outcomes, there were no differences in length of total hospitalization, recurrent abscess rates, or overall charges. There was a trend toward a longer operating time in patients undergoing initial appendectomy (61 minutes versus 42 minutes mean, P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Although initial laparoscopic appendectomy trends toward a requiring longer operative time, there seems to be no advantages between these strategies in terms of total hospitalization, recurrent abscess rate, or total charges.

摘要

引言

穿孔性阑尾炎是儿童的常见病症,少数患者可能会形成脓肿。对于这类患者,通常先采用经皮引流/抽吸脓肿,然后给予静脉抗生素的非手术初始治疗,随后择期行腹腔镜阑尾切除术。尽管这种策略已被广泛接受,但目前尚无文献比较初始非手术治疗(引流/择期阑尾切除术)与脓肿形成时直接行阑尾切除术这两种治疗策略。因此,我们开展了一项随机试验来比较这两种治疗策略。

方法

在内部审查委员会批准(#0611-164)后,通过计算机断层扫描成像明确存在局限性腹腔脓肿的患儿,入院时即被随机分为腹腔镜阑尾切除术组或静脉抗生素联合经皮脓肿引流组(如果可行),随后在大约 10 周后行择期腹腔镜阑尾切除术。这是一项基于我们近期阑尾炎合并脓肿患者数量的试点研究,样本量为 40 例。

结果

就诊时,两组在年龄、体重、体重指数、性别分布、体温、白细胞计数、脓肿数量或轴位最大二维脓肿面积方面均无差异。在结局方面,总住院时间、复发性脓肿率或总费用均无差异。初始行阑尾切除术的患者手术时间有延长趋势(61 分钟比 42 分钟,P =.06)。

结论

虽然初始腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术时间可能较长,但在总住院时间、复发性脓肿率或总费用方面,这两种策略似乎没有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验