Lahey B B, Carlson C L
University of Miami School of Medicine.
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Feb;24(2):110-20. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400208.
The validity of the diagnostic category of Attention Deficit Disorder Without Hyperactivity (ADD/WO) has been the subject of debate since it was first introduced in DSM-III. The differentiation of two syndromes of ADD is supported by factor analytic studies that indicate two dimensions of maladjustment: (1) inattention and disorganization, and (2) motor hyperactivity and impulsive responding. Cluster analyses of these two dimensions have yielded two profiles of deviance that correspond to the DSM-III subtypes. Furthermore, clinic-referred children who meet DSM-III criteria for ADD/WO have been shown to exhibit less serious conduct problems, are less impulsive, are more likely to be characterized as sluggish and drowsy, are less rejected by peers but more socially withdrawn, and are more likely to exhibit depressed mood and symptoms of anxiety disorder than children with Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity (ADD/H).
自“无多动症状的注意力缺陷障碍”(ADD/WO)这一诊断类别在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)中首次引入以来,其有效性一直是争论的焦点。对ADD两种综合征的区分得到了因素分析研究的支持,这些研究表明存在两种适应不良维度:(1)注意力不集中与杂乱无章,以及(2)多动和冲动反应。对这两个维度的聚类分析产生了两种偏差概况,与DSM - III的亚型相对应。此外,与符合ADD/H(多动症状的注意力缺陷障碍)标准的儿童相比,符合DSM - III中ADD/WO标准的临床转诊儿童表现出的品行问题较轻,冲动性较低,更可能表现为行动迟缓、嗜睡,较少被同伴拒绝但社交退缩更明显,并且更可能表现出抑郁情绪和焦虑症症状。