• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人的门诊医疗自付额增加和住院率增加。

Increased ambulatory care copayments and hospitalizations among the elderly.

机构信息

Department of Community Health, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0904533.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa0904533
PMID:20107218
Abstract

BACKGROUND

When copayments for ambulatory care are increased, elderly patients may forgo important outpatient care, leading to increased use of hospital care.

METHODS

We compared longitudinal changes in the use of outpatient and inpatient care between enrollees in Medicare plans that increased copayments for ambulatory care and enrollees in matched control plans--similar plans that made no changes in these copayments. The study population included 899,060 beneficiaries enrolled in 36 Medicare plans during the period from 2001 through 2006.

RESULTS

In plans that increased copayments for ambulatory care, mean copayments nearly doubled for both primary care ($7.38 to $14.38) and specialty care ($12.66 to $22.05). In control plans, mean copayments for primary care and specialty care remained unchanged at $8.33 and $11.38, respectively. In the year after the rise in copayments, plans that increased cost sharing had 19.8 fewer annual outpatient visits per 100 enrollees (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.6 to 23.1), 2.2 additional annual hospital admissions per 100 enrollees (95% CI, 1.8 to 2.6), 13.4 more annual inpatient days per 100 enrollees (95% CI, 10.2 to 16.6), and an increase of 0.7 percentage points in the proportion of enrollees who were hospitalized (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.95), as compared with concurrent trends in control plans. These estimates were consistent among a cohort of continuously enrolled beneficiaries. The effects of increases in copayments for ambulatory care were magnified among enrollees living in areas of lower income and education and among enrollees who had hypertension, diabetes, or a history of myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Raising cost sharing for ambulatory care among elderly patients may have adverse health consequences and may increase total spending on health care.

摘要

背景

当门诊护理的共付额增加时,老年患者可能会放弃重要的门诊护理,导致更多地使用住院护理。

方法

我们比较了参加门诊护理共付额增加的 Medicare 计划的参保人和参加没有这些共付额变化的匹配对照组计划的参保人在门诊和住院护理使用方面的纵向变化。研究人群包括 2001 年至 2006 年期间参加 36 个 Medicare 计划的 899060 名参保人。

结果

在门诊护理共付额增加的计划中,初级保健的平均共付额几乎翻了一番(从 7.38 美元增加到 14.38 美元),专科护理的共付额也从 12.66 美元增加到 22.05 美元。在对照组计划中,初级保健和专科保健的平均共付额保持不变,分别为 8.33 美元和 11.38 美元。在共付额增加的次年,增加费用分担的计划中,每 100 名参保人每年的门诊就诊次数减少 19.8 次(95%置信区间[CI],16.6 至 23.1),每年的住院人数增加 2.2 次(95%CI,1.8 至 2.6),每年的住院天数增加 13.4 天(95%CI,10.2 至 16.6),以及住院参保人数比例增加 0.7 个百分点(95%CI,0.51 至 0.95),而对照组计划中则呈现出同期趋势。这些估计在一组连续参保人中是一致的。在收入和教育程度较低的地区以及患有高血压、糖尿病或心肌梗死病史的参保人中,门诊护理共付额的增加放大了其影响。

结论

提高老年患者的门诊护理共付额可能会产生不良的健康后果,并可能增加医疗保健总支出。

相似文献

1
Increased ambulatory care copayments and hospitalizations among the elderly.老年人的门诊医疗自付额增加和住院率增加。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0904533.
2
Association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees.医疗保险优势计划参保者的每日共付额与住院治疗使用率的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4770-1.
3
Effect of copayments on use of outpatient mental health services among elderly managed care enrollees.共付额对老年管理式医疗参保者门诊心理健康服务使用的影响。
Med Care. 2011 Mar;49(3):281-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31820399f6.
4
Increased ambulatory care copayments and hospitalizations.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1544; author reply 1544. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1002539.
5
Insurance parity and the use of outpatient mental health care following a psychiatric hospitalization.保险平价与精神病住院治疗后的门诊心理健康护理使用情况
JAMA. 2008 Dec 24;300(24):2879-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.888.
6
Association of Cost Sharing With Use of Home Health Services Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees.医保优势参保人中费用分担与家庭健康服务使用的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):1012-1018. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1058.
7
Association of Financial Integration Between Physicians and Hospitals With Commercial Health Care Prices.医生和医院之间财务融合与商业医疗价格的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1932-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4610.
8
Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in Medicare health plans.费用分担对医疗保险健康计划中乳腺钼靶筛查的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 24;358(4):375-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa070929.
9
Out-of-Pocket Spending for Hospitalizations Among Nonelderly Adults.非老年成年人住院的自付费用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1325-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3663.
10
Cost-Sharing Disparities for Out-of-Network Care for Adults With Behavioral Health Conditions.网络外行为健康护理的费用分担差距:成人视角
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14554.

引用本文的文献

1
Loss of Subsidized Drug Coverage and Mortality among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的补贴药物覆盖范围丧失与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2025 May 29;392(20):2025-2034. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2414435. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Utilisation of outpatient care immediately before emergency admission for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions in Japan: a retrospective observational study.日本非卧床照护敏感型疾病紧急入院前门诊照护的利用情况:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):e086714. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086714.
3
A Chinese conundrum: does higher insurance coverage for hospitalization reduce financial protection for the patients who most need it?
一个中国难题:更高的住院保险覆盖率是否会降低最需要保险的患者的经济保障?
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Mar 7;40(3):287-299. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae108.
4
Geographic variation in inpatient medical expenditure among older adults aged 75 years and above in Japan: a three-level multilevel analysis of nationwide data.日本 75 岁及以上老年人住院医疗支出的地域差异:基于全国数据的三级多层分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 28;12:1306013. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1306013. eCollection 2024.
5
Does the immediate reimbursement of medical insurance reduce the socioeconomic inequality in health among the floating population? Evidence from China.医疗保险即时报销是否降低了流动人口的健康的社会经济不平等?来自中国的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 May 17;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01913-7.
6
Effects of decreasing the out-of-pocket expenses for outpatient care on health-seeking behaviors, health outcomes and medical expenses of people with diabetes: evidence from China.降低门诊医疗自费费用对糖尿病患者就医行为、健康结果和医疗费用的影响:来自中国的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Nov 16;21(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01775-5.
7
Medicaid Expansion and Medicare-Financed Hospitalizations Among Adult Patients With Incident Kidney Failure.医疗补助扩张与成年新发肾衰竭患者的医疗保险资金资助的住院治疗。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Nov 4;3(11):e223878. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3878.
8
Does the Effectiveness of a Medicine Copay Voucher Vary by Baseline Medication Out-Of-Pocket Expenses? Insights From ARTEMIS.药品共付券的有效性是否因基线药物自付费用而异?来自 ARTEMIS 的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 18;11(20):e026421. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026421. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
9
Affordability of Medical Care Among Medicare Enrollees.医疗保险参保者的医疗保健负担能力。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Dec 10;2(12):e214104. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4104. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Association of Medicaid Expansion With Medicaid Enrollment and Health Care Use Among Older Adults With Low Income and Chronic Condition Limitations.医疗补助扩张与低收入和慢性病限制的老年患者的医疗补助参保和医疗保健使用的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jun 3;3(6):e221373. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1373. eCollection 2022 Jun.