• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品监管与卫生技术评估。

Medicines regulation and health technology assessment.

机构信息

Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Feb;87(2):152-4. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.261.

DOI:10.1038/clpt.2009.261
PMID:20107448
Abstract

Health technology assessment (HTA) is as important as regulation to allow patients access to new medicines, and there are demands that the two processes should be carried out more closely together in time. Although the methods used by the regulator differ from those used by the health technology assessor, there is scope for synergies that would be useful to both parties. By providing scientific advice to sponsors of new medicines, both regulators and health technology assessors can also provide support for drug innovation.

摘要

健康技术评估(HTA)与监管一样重要,它可以让患者获得新药,因此人们要求这两个过程应该更紧密地结合在一起。虽然监管机构使用的方法与健康技术评估人员使用的方法不同,但有协同作用的空间,这对双方都将是有益的。通过向新药的赞助商提供科学建议,监管机构和健康技术评估人员都可以为药物创新提供支持。

相似文献

1
Medicines regulation and health technology assessment.药品监管与卫生技术评估。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Feb;87(2):152-4. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.261.
2
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
3
The state of innovation in drug development.药物研发中的创新状况。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Feb;83(2):227-30. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100479.
4
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
5
History of health technology assessment: Spain.卫生技术评估史:西班牙
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:163-73. doi: 10.1017/S026646230909059X. Epub 2009 Jun 19.
6
Drug development for children: how is pharma tackling an unmet need?儿童药物研发:制药行业如何应对未满足的需求?
IDrugs. 2008 Jul;11(7):502-7.
7
The right to a trial: Should dying patients have access to experimental drugs?审判权:临终患者是否应有权使用实验性药物?
New Yorker. 2006 Dec 18:40-7.
8
Realizing two-tiered innovation policy through drug regulation.通过药品监管实现两级创新政策。
Stanford Law Rev. 2006 Feb;58(4):1221-50.
9
The evolution of human medicines control from a national to an international perspective.人类药品监管从国家层面到国际层面的演变。
Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev. 1998 Mar;17(1):19-50.
10
Health technology assessment.卫生技术评估
Singapore Med J. 2006 Mar;47(3):187-92; quiz 193.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to Michael Wonder's comments on the article 'Assessment of the therapeutic value of new medicines marketed in Australia'.对迈克尔·旺德就《澳大利亚上市新药治疗价值评估》一文发表的评论的回应。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2013 Oct 10;6:8. doi: 10.1186/2052-3211-6-8. eCollection 2013.
2
Assessment of the therapeutic value of new medicines marketed in Australia.对在澳大利亚上市的新药的治疗价值评估。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2013 Jun 13;6:2. doi: 10.1186/2052-3211-6-2. eCollection 2013.
3
Reimbursement decisions of the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group: influence of policy and clinical and economic factors.
全威尔士药品策略组的报销决策:政策及临床和经济因素的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Sep 1;30(9):779-94. doi: 10.2165/11591530-000000000-00000.
4
Translating comparative effectiveness research into clinical practice: the UK experience.将比较效果研究转化为临床实践:英国的经验。
Drugs. 2012 Jan 22;72(2):163-70. doi: 10.2165/11630860-000000000-00000.
5
International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.五个司法管辖区的比较有效性研究的国际比较:对美国的启示。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):813-30. doi: 10.2165/11536150-000000000-00000.