Division of Endocrinology, Hospital das Clinicas, Pernambuco Federal University, Rua Clovis Silveira Barros, 84/1202, Boa Vista, Recife, PE, CEP 50.050-270, Brazil.
Pituitary. 2010 Sep;13(3):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s11102-010-0217-8.
Dopamine agonists are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas. However, there are still controversies concerning dose, treatment duration and criteria for drug withdrawal in different clinical situations. The aim of this study was to assess diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to prolactinomas among members of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM). SBEM members answered a questionnaire sent by e-mail that included 18 questions related to controversial issues about the management of prolactinomas. Among SBEM members, 721 (approximately 24% of total) answered the questionnaire. Concerning the diagnosis, 38% of the respondents stated that prolactin levels < 100 ng/ml would exclude the presence of a prolactinoma. Most of them favored the screening for macroprolactin in asymptomatic individuals instead of a routine screening (74% vs. 26%). Regarding the treatment, 70% of the respondents chose cabergoline as the drug of choice to treat macroprolactinomas whereas similar proportions advised cabergoline or bromocriptine as the best treatment for microprolactinomas (52% vs. 48%). Only 20% and 34% of respondents favored treatment withdrawal 2-3 years after prolactin normalization in patients with macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas, respectively. In case of pregnancy, only 58 and 70% of respondents advocated discontinuation of treatment with dopamine agonists in patients with macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas, respectively. Finally, only 36% would allow breast-feeding without restriction, 44% would restrict it to patients with microprolactinomas and 20% would not recommend it for women with prolactinomas There are several points of disagreement among SBEM members regarding the management of prolactinomas.
多巴胺激动剂是催乳素瘤的首选治疗方法。然而,在不同的临床情况下,关于剂量、治疗持续时间和停药标准仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估巴西内分泌学会(SBEM)成员对催乳素瘤的诊断和治疗方法。SBEM 成员通过电子邮件回答了一份包含 18 个与催乳素瘤管理相关的争议问题的问卷。在 SBEM 成员中,有 721 人(约占总数的 24%)回答了问卷。关于诊断,38%的受访者表示,催乳素水平<100ng/ml 将排除催乳素瘤的存在。他们大多数人赞成在无症状个体中筛查大泌乳素,而不是常规筛查(74%对 26%)。关于治疗,70%的受访者选择卡麦角林作为治疗大泌乳素瘤的首选药物,而类似比例的人建议卡麦角林或溴隐亭作为治疗微泌乳素瘤的最佳药物(52%对 48%)。只有 20%和 34%的受访者赞成在大泌乳素瘤和微泌乳素瘤患者催乳素正常后 2-3 年停药。在怀孕期间,只有 58%和 70%的受访者分别主张停止大泌乳素瘤和微泌乳素瘤患者的多巴胺激动剂治疗。最后,只有 36%的人允许无限制母乳喂养,44%的人限制在微泌乳素瘤患者中,20%的人不建议患有催乳素瘤的女性母乳喂养。SBEM 成员在催乳素瘤的管理方面存在几个分歧点。